ArticlePloS one2013
A versatile medium for cultivating methanogenic archaea.
Article in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 63 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
63 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 103 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- Tobacco-smoking-related prevalence of methanogens in the oral fluid microbiota.Scientific reports · 2018Trial
- Methanobrevibacter smithii strain U29 whole genome sequence delineates M. smithii intermediate cell variants.BMC research notes · 2025Article
- Microbial enhanced oil recovery: process perspectives, challenges, and advanced technologies for its efficient applications and feasibility.Archives of microbiology · 2025Review
- Review
- Stable coexistence between an archaeal virus and the dominant methanogen of the human gut.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Article
- Article
- Human associated Archaea: a neglected microbiome worth investigating.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2024Review
- Review
- Article
- Review
- Holistic View and Novel Perspective on Ruminal and Extra-Gastrointestinal Methanogens in Cattle.Microorganisms · 2023Review
- An Initial Proteomic Analysis of Biogas-Related Metabolism ofMicroorganisms · 2023Article
- Culturing the Human Oral Microbiota, Updating Methodologies and Cultivation Techniques.Microorganisms · 2023Review
- Trait biases in microbial reference genomes.Scientific data · 2023Article
- The Overlooked Microbiome-Considering Archaea and Eukaryotes Using Multiplex Nanopore-16S-/18S-rDNA-Sequencing: A Technical Report Focusing on Nasopharyngeal Microbiomes.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Culture-based and culture-independent approach for the study of the methanogens and obligate anaerobes from different landfill sites.Frontiers in microbiology · 2023Article
- Methanogenic archaea in the human gastrointestinal tract.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2022Review
- Rapid identification of clinically interesting methanogens using an improved MALDI-TOF-MS assay.Access microbiology · 2022Article
3 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Expression of concern · 2022-12-13Investigation by Journal/Publisher ·
- Erratum issued
- Expression of concern
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMethanobrevibacter smithii, Methanobrevibacter oralis, Methanosphaera stadtmanae, Methanomassilicoccus luminyensis and Methanobrevibacter arboriphilicus have been cultured from human digestive microbiota. Each one of these fastidious methanogenic archaea requires a specific medium for its growth, hampering their routine isolation and the culture. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL
findingsA new culture medium here referred as SAB medium was optimized and tested to cultivate methanogens associated with human microbiota, as well as two mesophile methanogens Methanobacterium beijingense and Methanosaeta concilii. It was further tested for the isolation of archaea from 20 human stool specimens including 10 specimens testing positive for PCR detection of M. smithii. After inoculating 10(5) colony-forming-unit archaea/mL or 1 g stool specimen in parallel in SAB medium and reference DSMZ medium in the presence of negative controls, growth of archaea was determined by optical microscopy and the measurement of methane production by gas chromatography. While the negative controls remained sterile, all tested archaea grew significantly more rapidly in SAB medium than in reference medium in 1-3 days (P<0.05, Student test). Among PCR-positive stool specimens, 10/10 grew in the SAB medium, 6/10 in DSMZ 119 medium, 5/10 in DSMZ 322 medium and 3/10 in DSMZ 334 c medium. Four out of ten PCR-negative stool specimens grew after a 3-week incubation in the SAB-medium whereas no growth was detected in any of the reference media. 16S rRNA gene sequencing yielded 99-100% sequence similarity with reference M. smithii except for one specimen that yielded 99-100% sequence similarity with reference Methanobrevibacter millerae. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: SAB medium allows for the versatile isolation and growth of methanogenic archaea associated with human gut microbiota including the archaea missed by inoculation of reference media. Implementation of the SAB medium in veterinary and medical microbiology laboratories will ease the routine culture-based detection of methanogenic archaea in clinical and environmental specimens.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.