ArticlePloS one2013
Large-scale event extraction from literature with multi-level gene normalization.
Article in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
54 citing papers in PubMed, 123 citations in OpenAlex.
- PlantConnectome: A knowledge graph database encompassing >71,000 plant articles.The Plant cell · 2025Article
- A novel approach for target deconvolution from phenotype-based screening using knowledge graph.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Improving dictionary-based named entity recognition with deep learning.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2024Article
- Identifying vital nodes for yeast network by dynamic network entropy.BMC bioinformatics · 2024Article
- Crosstalk between MIR-96 and IRS/PI3K/AKT/VEGF cascade in hRPE cells; A potential target for preventing diabetic retinopathy.PloS one · 2024Article
- GePI: large-scale text mining, customized retrieval and flexible filtering of gene/protein interactions.Nucleic acids research · 2023Article
- Automated assembly of molecular mechanisms at scale from text mining and curated databases.Molecular systems biology · 2023Article
- Article
- A survey on clinical natural language processing in the United Kingdom from 2007 to 2022.NPJ digital medicine · 2022Review
- Endothelial cells response to neutrophil-derived extracellular vesicles miRNAs in anti-PR3 positive vasculitis.Clinical and experimental immunology · 2021Observational
- The STRING database in 2021: customizable protein-protein networks, and functional characterization of user-uploaded gene/measurement sets.Nucleic acids research · 2021Article
- DeepEventMine: end-to-end neural nested event extraction from biomedical texts.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2020Article
- PEDL: extracting protein-protein associations using deep language models and distant supervision.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2020Article
- Uncovering the Underlying Mechanisms of Cancer Metabolism through the Landscapes and Probability Flux Quantifications.iScience · 2020Article
- Discovery of disease- and drug-specific pathways through community structures of a literature network.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2020Article
- FLUTE: Fast and reliable knowledge retrieval from biomedical literature.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2020Article
- PMC text mining subset in BioC: about three million full-text articles and growing.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2019Article
- The Evolution of Gene Duplicates in Angiosperms and the Impact of Protein-Protein Interactions and the Mechanism of Duplication.Genome biology and evolution · 2019Article
- 1,25(OH)FASEB bioAdvances · 2019Article
- SemNet: Using Local Features to Navigate the Biomedical Concept Graph.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Text mining for the life sciences aims to aid database curation, knowledge summarization and information retrieval through the automated processing of biomedical texts. To provide comprehensive coverage and enable full integration with existing biomolecular database records, it is crucial that text mining tools scale up to millions of articles and that their analyses can be unambiguously linked to information recorded in resources such as UniProt, KEGG, BioGRID and NCBI databases. In this study, we investigate how fully automated text mining of complex biomolecular events can be augmented with a normalization strategy that identifies biological concepts in text, mapping them to identifiers at varying levels of granularity, ranging from canonicalized symbols to unique gene and proteins and broad gene families. To this end, we have combined two state-of-the-art text mining components, previously evaluated on two community-wide challenges, and have extended and improved upon these methods by exploiting their complementary nature. Using these systems, we perform normalization and event extraction to create a large-scale resource that is publicly available, unique in semantic scope, and covers all 21.9 million PubMed abstracts and 460 thousand PubMed Central open access full-text articles. This dataset contains 40 million biomolecular events involving 76 million gene/protein mentions, linked to 122 thousand distinct genes from 5032 species across the full taxonomic tree. Detailed evaluations and analyses reveal promising results for application of this data in database and pathway curation efforts. The main software components used in this study are released under an open-source license. Further, the resulting dataset is freely accessible through a novel API, providing programmatic and customized access (http://www.evexdb.org/api/v001/). Finally, to allow for large-scale bioinformatic analyses, the entire resource is available for bulk download from http://evexdb.org/download/, under the Creative Commons - Attribution - Share Alike (CC BY-SA) license.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.