Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23613621›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of gastroenterology2013

Colorectal anastomotic leakage: aspects of prevention, detection and treatment.

Freek Daams, Misha Luyer, Johan F Lange

Registry-linked trialAbstract readEditorial
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of gastroenterology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02589483 (RORA), which is not on this map. Cited by 56 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02589483 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2016, after this paper: background citation

RORA (Reinforcement of Rectal Anastomosis(<10cm) With HemoPatch - Pilot Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorSt Goran's HospitalRan2016 to 2018Enrolled10ConditionsRectal CancerArmsThe rectal anastomosis will be reinforced with HemoPatch., Hemopatch
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. [Postoperative Imaging Findings of Colorectal Surgery: A Pictorial Essay].Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology · 2024
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Freek Daams
Misha Luyer
Johan F Lange

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

All colorectal surgeons are faced from time to time with anastomotic leakage after colorectal surgery. This complication has been studied extensively without a significant reduction of incidence over the last 30 years. New techniques of prevention, by innovative anastomotic techniques should improve results in the future, but standardization and "teachability" should be guaranteed. Risk scoring enables intra-operative decision-making whether to restore continuity or deviate. Early detection can lead to reduction in delay of diagnosis as long as a standard system is used. For treatment options, no firm evidence is available, but future studies could focus on repair and saving of the anastomosis on the one hand or anastomotical breakdown and definitive colostomy on the other hand.

Indexed as

Anastomosis, SurgicalAnastomotic LeakAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalColorectal SurgeryFemaleHumansMalePostoperative ComplicationsRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsSex FactorsAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalAnastomotic leakageColorectal surgeryComplicationsPostoperative carePrevention

Identifiers

PMID23613621
PMCPMC3631979

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.