Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23612787›Full record

ReviewSchmerz (Berlin, Germany)2013

[Ultrasound in interventional pain therapy].

J A Blunk

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Schmerz (Berlin, Germany), 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

J A BlunkKlinik für Anästhesiologie und Operative Intensivmedizin, Uniklinikum Köln, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Köln, Deutschland. james.blunk@uk-koeln.de
Poliklinik für Endokrinologie, Diabetologie und Präventivmedizin · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Peripheral nerve blocks are currently performed relatively blind even in the most complex anatomical structures and physicians mostly rely on palpable anatomical landmarks on the surface. Ultrasound has become an indispensable part of the modern medical world and has long since found its way into almost all medical professions. More and more this trend also reaches interventional pain physicians as it is possible to accurately target structures, to track the needle course during the intervention and to visualize the spread of the local anesthetic. Another advantage compared to other radiological techniques is the profound radiation safety for patients as well as for personnel performing the intervention. A deep understanding of anatomy and its correlate in ultrasound images is one of the most important requirements for the successful use of these interventional techniques. Moreover, the safe performance of the procedure depends on the simultaneous hand-eye coordination. Nevertheless, despite the euphoria ultrasound technology should only be used in pain management with sufficient indications.

Indexed as

Anesthetics, LocalHumansNerve BlockPain ManagementPain MeasurementUltrasonography, InterventionalAnesthetics, Local

Identifiers

PMID23612787
OpenAlexW3023182689

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.