ArticleSurgical endoscopy2013
National outcomes and uptake of laparoscopic gastrectomy for cancer in England.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- [Evidence in minimally invasive oncological gastric surgery].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2021Pooled it
- Laparoscopic versus open subtotal gastrectomy for gastric adenocarcinoma: cost-effectiveness analysis.BJS open · 2020Pooled it
- Clinical outcomes of endoscopic balloon dilatation for postoperative anastomotic stricture after distal gastrectomy.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Higher incidence of cholelithiasis with Roux-en-Y reconstruction compared with Billroth-I after laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a retrospective cohort study.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2024Article
- Laparoscopic versus Open Surgery for Gastric Cancer in Western Countries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Short- and Long-Term Outcomes.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Review
- Minimally invasive versus open surgery for gastric cancer in Turkish population.Turkish journal of surgery · 2021Article
- Laparoscopic Surgery for Gastric Cancer: The European Point of View.Journal of oncology · 2019Review
- Benchmarking of aggregated length of stay after open and laparoscopic surgery for cancers of the digestive system.BJS open · 2018Article
- Cut the stomach but do not cut the gut?Journal of visualized surgery · 2016Article
- Circumstance of endoscopic and laparoscopic treatments for gastric cancer in Japan: A review of epidemiological studies using a national administrative database.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2015Review
- Laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer with peritoneal dissemination after induction chemotherapy.Case reports in gastroenterology · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGastrectomy remains the mainstay of curative treatment for gastric cancer, yet it is associated with significant postoperative mortality. The laparoscopic approach has been introduced in an attempt to improve surgical outcomes. This study examines the uptake of laparoscopic gastrectomy in England and quantifies postoperative mortality and morbidity following gastrectomy for cancer.
methodsA population-based study of a national administrative database was undertaken. Patients undergoing gastrectomy for cancer in any National Health Services hospital in England between April 2000 and March 2010 were included. The main outcome measures were mortality, morbidity and length of stay.
resultsA total of 10,713 patients underwent gastrectomy, of which 10,233 (95.5%) underwent open gastrectomy (OG), and 480 (4.5%) underwent laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG). There was no significant difference in 30-day in-hospital mortality between OG and LG (5.6% vs. 4.8%; p = 0.461). Medical complications occurred in 2,311 (22.6%) and 120 (25%) patients from OG and LG groups respectively (p = 0.217). Patients in the LG groups had a shorter hospital stay than OG with median (interquartile range) of 11 (8-17) versus 14 (11-19) days respectively (p < 0.001). Readmission and reoperation rates were 10.2 versus 12.1% (p = 0.175) and 4 versus 4.6% (p = 0.523) for OG and LG respectively.
conclusionsLG is increasingly being performed in England. Postoperative morbidity and mortality of LG is similar to that of OG, but it is associated with a shorter hospital stay. Data from randomised controlled trials evaluating long term survival and patients' reported outcomes are essential before the final judgement on the value of LG in the management of gastric cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.