ReviewHeredity2014
The evolution of quantitative traits in complex environments.
Review in Heredity, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
43 citing papers in PubMed, 141 citations in OpenAlex.
- Multi-parent mapping reveals epistatic architecture and elite haplotypes for multi-trait improvement in cotton.Genome biology · 2026Article
- A bacterial ecocline in Klebsiella pneumoniae may explain its backboned phylogeny.PLoS biology · 2026Article
- Dominant foliar endophytes influence soybean yield and transcriptome.FEMS microbiology ecology · 2025Article
- Distribution of Tunisian beet wild relatives (Heliyon · 2025Article
- Increasing Aridity May Threaten the Maintenance of a Plant Defence Polymorphism.Ecology letters · 2025Article
- Untangling biodiversity interactions: A meta network on pollination in Earth's most diverse tropical savanna.Ecology and evolution · 2024Article
- Whole-genome analysis of recombinant inbred rice lines reveals a quantitative trait locus on chromosome 3 with genotype-by-environment interaction effects.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2023Article
- Assessing the role of family level variation and heat shock gene expression in the thermal stress response of the mosquitoPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023Article
- Soil variation among natural habitats alters glucosinolate content in a wild perennial mustard.Journal of experimental botany · 2023Article
- Application of plant extended phenotypes to manage the agricultural microbiome belowground.Frontiers in microbiomes · 2023Review
- An overview of genome-wide association mapping studies in Poaceae species (model crops: wheat and rice).Molecular biology reports · 2022Review
- The Promises, Challenges, and Opportunities of Omics for Studying the Plant Holobiont.Microorganisms · 2022Article
- Evolutionary Ecology of Plant-Arthropod Interactions in Light of the "Omics" Sciences: A Broad Guide.Frontiers in plant science · 2022Review
- Genotype-by-environment interactions drive the maintenance of genetic variation in aEvolutionary applications · 2021Article
- Ecological factors influence balancing selection on leaf chemical profiles of a wildflower.Nature ecology & evolution · 2021Article
- Plasticity to drought and ecotypic differentiation in populations of a crop wild relative.AoB PLANTS · 2020Article
- The effects of a bacterial challenge on reproductive success of fruit flies evolved under low or high sexual selection.Ecology and evolution · 2018Article
- Field studies reveal a close relative of C. elegans thrives in the fresh figs of Ficus septica and disperses on its Ceratosolen pollinating wasps.BMC ecology · 2018Article
- Large-scale replicated field study of maize rhizosphere identifies heritable microbes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018Article
- Plasticity of plant defense and its evolutionary implications in wild populations of Boechera stricta.Evolution; international journal of organic evolution · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Species inhabit complex environments and respond to selection imposed by numerous abiotic and biotic conditions that vary in both space and time. Environmental heterogeneity strongly influences trait evolution and patterns of adaptive population differentiation. For example, heterogeneity can favor local adaptation, or can promote the evolution of plastic genotypes that alter their phenotypes based on the conditions they encounter. Different abiotic and biotic agents of selection can act synergistically to either accelerate or constrain trait evolution. The environmental context has profound effects on quantitative genetic parameters. For instance, heritabilities measured in controlled conditions often exceed those measured in the field; thus, laboratory experiments could overestimate the potential for a population to respond to selection. Nevertheless, most studies of the genetic basis of ecologically relevant traits are conducted in simplified laboratory environments, which do not reflect the complexity of nature. Here, we advocate for manipulative field experiments in the native ranges of plant species that differ in mating system, life-history strategy and growth form. Field studies are vital to evaluate the roles of disparate agents of selection, to elucidate the targets of selection and to develop a nuanced perspective on the evolution of quantitative traits. Quantitative genetics field studies will also shed light on the potential for natural populations to adapt to novel climates in highly fragmented landscapes. Drawing from our experience with the ecological model system Boechera (Brassicaceae), we discuss advancements possible through dedicated field studies, highlight future research directions and examine the challenges associated with field studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.