Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23612286›Full record

ArticleNature communications2013

Competing signals drive telencephalon diversity.

J B Sylvester, C A Rich, C Yi, J N Peres, C Houart, J T Streelman

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Applying gene regulatory network logic to the evolution of social behavior.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Six3 dosage mediates the pathogenesis of holoprosencephaly.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2016
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

J B SylvesterParker H. Petit Institute for Bioengineering and Biosciences, School of Biology, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332, USA.
C A Rich
C Yi
J N Peres
C Houart
J T Streelman

Funding

Medical Research Council G0901525Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The telencephalon is the most complex brain region, controlling communication, emotion, movement and memory. Its adult derivatives develop from the dorsal pallium and ventral subpallium. Despite knowledge of genes required in these territories, we do not understand how evolution has shaped telencephalon diversity. Here, using rock- and sand-dwelling cichlid fishes from Lake Malawi, we demonstrate that differences in strength and timing of opposing Hedgehog and Wingless signals establish evolutionary divergence in dorsal-ventral telencephalon patterning. Rock dwellers exhibit early, extensive Hedgehog activity in the ventral forebrain resulting in expression of foxg1 before dorsal Wingless signals, and a larger subpallium. Sand dwellers show rapid deployment of Wingless, later foxg1 expression and a larger pallium. Manipulation of the Hedgehog and Wingless pathways in cichlid and zebrafish embryos is sufficient to mimic differences between rock- versus sand-dweller brains. Our data suggest that competing ventral Hedgehog and dorsal Wingless signals mediate evolutionary diversification of the telencephalon.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionSignal TransductionAnimalsBody PatterningCichlidsEcosystemEmbryo, NonmammalianGene Regulatory NetworksHedgehog ProteinsMalawiModels, BiologicalTelencephalonWnt ProteinsZebrafishHedgehog ProteinsWnt Proteins

Identifiers

PMID23612286

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.