Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23612190›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2013

Impact of the MIC of piperacillin-tazobactam on the outcome of patients with bacteremia due to extended-spectrum-β-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli.

Pilar Retamar, Lorena López-Cerero, Miguel Angel Muniain, Álvaro Pascual, Jesús Rodríguez-Baño, ESBL-REIPI/GEIH Group

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Impact of borderline minimum inhibitory concentration on the outcome of invasive infections caused by Enterobacteriaceae treated with β-lactams: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2015
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. When and How to Use MIC in Clinical Practice?Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Mutations inAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2017
    Article
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Pilar RetamarUnidad Clínica de Enfermedades Infecciosas y Microbiología, Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena, Sevilla, Spain.
Lorena López-Cerero
Miguel Angel Muniain
Álvaro Pascual
Jesús Rodríguez-Baño
ESBL-REIPI/GEIH Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We investigated the impact of the piperacillin-tazobactam MIC in the outcome of 39 bloodstream infections due to extended-spectrum-β-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli. All 11 patients with urinary tract infections survived, irrespective of the MIC. For other sources, 30-day mortality was lower for isolates with a MIC of ≤ 2 mg/liter than for isolates with a higher MIC (0% versus 41.1%; P = 0.02).

Indexed as

AgedAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacteremiabeta-LactamasesCohort StudiesDrug Therapy, CombinationEnzyme InhibitorsEscherichia coliEscherichia coli InfectionsHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsPenicillanic AcidPiperacillinPiperacillin, Tazobactam Drug CombinationTazobactamTreatment OutcomeAnti-Bacterial Agentsbeta-LactamasesEnzyme InhibitorsPenicillanic AcidPiperacillinPiperacillin, Tazobactam Drug CombinationTazobactam

Identifiers

PMID23612190
PMCPMC3697383

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.