Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23612036›Full record

SynthesisThe Journal of cardiovascular nursing2014

Community-based cardiovascular health interventions in vulnerable populations: a systematic review.

Benita Walton-Moss, Laura Samuel, Tam H Nguyen, Yvonne Commodore-Mensah, Matthew J Hayat, Sarah L Szanton

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Journal of cardiovascular nursing, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Interventions to improve physical activity among socioeconomically disadvantaged groups: an umbrella review.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2018
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Benita Walton-MossBenita Walton-Moss, FNP-BC, DNS Associate Professor, School of Nursing, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland. Laura Samuel, RN, FNP Doctoral Candidate, School of Nursing, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland. Tam H. Nguyen, RN, MSN/MPH, PhD Research Associate, School of Nursing, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland. Yvonne Commodore-Mensah, RN, BSN Doctoral Candidate, School of Nursing, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland. Matthew J. Hayat, PhD Assistant Professor, Rutgers University, College of Nursing, Newark, New Jersey. Sarah L. Szanton, RN, CRNP, PhD Assistant Professor, School of Nursing, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.
Laura Samuel
Tam H Nguyen
Yvonne Commodore-Mensah
Matthew J Hayat
Sarah L Szanton
Johns Hopkins University · US

Funding

Translation CoreP30NR011409 · NINR · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI HAN, HAE-RA · 2009 to 2012
$1.8M
NINR NIH HHS P30 NR011409
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough cardiovascular health has been improving for many Americans, this is not true of those in "vulnerable populations." To address this growing disparity, communities and researchers have worked for decades, and as a result of their work, a growing body of literature supports the use of community engagement as a component of successful interventions. However, little literature synthesizes community-based interventions that address this disparity among a wide range of vulnerable populations.

objectiveThis article provides a critical review of community-based cardiovascular disease interventions to improve cardiovascular health behaviors and factors among vulnerable populations based on the American Heart Association's 7 metrics of ideal cardiovascular health.

methodsIn February 2011, 4 databases (PubMed, PsychInfo, CINAHL, and Scopus) were searched using the following keywords: vulnerable populations OR healthcare disparities AND cardiovascular disease AND clinical trials OR public health practice AND English.

resultsThis search strategy resulted in the retrieval of 7120 abstracts. Each abstract was reviewed by at least 2 authors, and eligibility for the systematic review was confirmed after reading the full article. Thirty-two studies met eligibility criteria. Education was the most common intervention (41%), followed by counseling or support (38%) and exercise classes (28%). Half of the interventions were multicomponent. Healthcare providers were the most frequent interventionists. Interventions aimed at decreasing blood pressure were the most promising, whereas behavior change interventions were the most challenging. Almost all of the interventions were at the individual level and were proof-of-concept or efficacy trials.

conclusionsThis analysis provides a step toward understanding the current literature on cardiovascular interventions for vulnerable population. The next step should be integrating the identified successful interventions into larger health systems and/or social policies.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesCommunity Health ServicesHealth EducationHealth PromotionHumansPrimary Health CareVulnerable Populations

Identifiers

PMID23612036
PMCPMC3859833
OpenAlexW2335780106

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.