Trial reportBiology of blood and marrow transplantation : journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation2013
Autologous umbilical cord blood infusion followed by oral docosahexaenoic acid and vitamin D supplementation for C-peptide preservation in children with Type 1 diabetes.
Trial report in Biology of blood and marrow transplantation : journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 59 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy and safety of stem cell therapy in type 1 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.The Indian journal of medical research · 2026Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of stem cell therapy in patients with Diabetes Mellitus - a systematic review and meta-analysis.Systematic reviews · 2026Pooled it
- A meta-analysis on application and prospect of cell therapy in the treatment of diabetes mellitus.Stem cell research & therapy · 2025Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Therapeutic efficacy of umbilical cord-derived stem cells for diabetes mellitus: a meta-analysis study.Stem cell research & therapy · 2020Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Implications of maternal-fetal health on perinatal stem cell banking.Gene therapy · 2024Review
- Review
- Gastrin producing syngeneic mesenchymal stem cells protect non-obese diabetic mice from type 1 diabetes.Autoimmunity · 2022Article
- Diagnosis and treatment of type 1 diabetes at the dawn of the personalized medicine era.Journal of translational medicine · 2021Review
- High Integrity and Fidelity of Long-Term Cryopreserved Umbilical Cord Blood for Transplantation.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Article
- Metabolic and Metabolomic Insights Regarding the Omega-3 PUFAs Intake in Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2021Review
- Evaluation of Vitamin D Metabolism in Patients with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus in the Setting of Cholecalciferol Treatment.Nutrients · 2020Article
- Influence of Vitamin D on Islet Autoimmunity and Beta-Cell Function in Type 1 Diabetes.Nutrients · 2019Review
- Efficacies of Stem Cell Therapies for Functional Improvement of theInternational journal of stem cells · 2019Review
- The Future State of Newborn Stem Cell Banking.Journal of clinical medicine · 2019Article
- Stem cell transplantation for the treatment of patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus: A meta-analysis.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2018Article
- Efficacy and safety of combined immunosuppressive therapy plus umbilical cord blood infusion in severe aplastic anemia patients: A cohort study.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2018Article
- Stem cell therapy for patients with diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of metabolomics-based risks and benefits.Stem cell investigation · 2018Article
- Expansion of Human Tregs from Cryopreserved Umbilical Cord Blood for GMP-Compliant Autologous Adoptive Cell Transfer Therapy.Molecular therapy. Methods & clinical development · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
We sought to determine if autologous umbilical cord blood (UCB) infusion followed by 1 year of supplementation with vitamin D and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) can preserve C-peptide in children with type 1 diabetes. We conducted an open-label, 2:1 randomized study in which 15 type 1 diabetes subjects with stimulated C-peptide > .2 pmol/mL received either (1) autologous UCB infusion, 1 year of daily oral vitamin D (2000 IU), and DHA (38 mg/kg) and intensive diabetes management or (2) intensive diabetes management alone. Primary analyses were performed 1 year after UCB infusion. Treated (N = 10) and control (N = 5) subjects had median ages of 7.2 and 6.6 years, respectively. No severe adverse events were observed. Although the absolute rate of C-peptide decline was slower in treated versus control subjects, intergroup comparisons failed to reach significance (P = .29). Area under the curve C-peptide declined and insulin use increased in both groups (P < .01). Vitamin D levels remained stable in treated subjects but declined in control subjects (P = .01). DHA levels rose in treated subjects versus control subjects (P = .003). CD4/CD8 ratio remained stable in treated subjects but declined in control subjects (P = .03). No changes were seen in regulatory T cell frequency, total CD4 counts, or autoantibody titers. Autologous UCB infusion followed by daily supplementation with vitamin D and DHA was safe but failed to preserve C-peptide. Lack of significance may reflect small sample size. Future efforts will require expansion of specific immunoregulatory cell subsets, optimization of combined immunoregulatory and anti-inflammatory agents, and larger study cohorts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.