Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23610663›Full record

ArticleBone & joint research2012

Does a new knee design perform as well as the design it replaces?

M Molt, P Ljung, S Toksvig-Larsen

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bone & joint research, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00436982 (Evaluation of Triathlon - a New Total Knee Prosthesis System. Prospective, Comparative, Randomised, Roentgen Stereophotogrammetric Analysis), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00436982 nacompletednot on this map

Evaluation of Triathlon - a New Total Knee Prosthesis System. Prospective, Comparative, Randomised, Roentgen Stereophotogrammetric Analysis (RSA) Series

TypeinterventionalSponsorStryker OrthopaedicsRan2006 to 2017Enrolled60ConditionsArthroplasty, Replacement, KneeArmsCemented Triathlon total knee system, Duracon total knee system
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Low implant migration of the SIGMAKnee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2018
    Article
  13. No differences in functional results and quality of life after single-radius or multiradius TKA.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2016
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

M MoltHässleholm Hospital, Orthopaedic Clinic Hässleholm - Kristianstad - Ystad, Box 351, 281 25 Hässleholm, Sweden.
P Ljung
S Toksvig-Larsen

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe objective of this study was to compare the early migration characteristics and functional outcome of the Triathlon cemented knee prosthesis with its predecessor, the Duracon cemented knee prosthesis (both Stryker).

methodsA total 60 patients were prospectively randomised and tibial component migration was measured by radiostereometric analysis (RSA) at three months, one year and two years; clinical outcome was measured by the American Knee Society score and the Knee Osteoarthritis and Injury Outcome Score.

resultsThere were no statistically significant differences in rotation or translation around or along the three coordinal axes, or in the maximum total point motion (MTPM) during the two-year follow-up.

conclusionsThe Triathlon cemented knee prosthesis has similar early stability and is likely to perform at least as well as the Duracon cemented knee prosthesis over the longer term.

Indexed as

New designRSASafetySingle radiusTKRTotal knee replacement

Identifiers

PMID23610663
PMCPMC3626188

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.