Trial reportProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2013
A monocular contribution to stimulus rivalry.
Trial report in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.
- An anti-Hebbian model for binocular visual plasticity and its attentional modulation.Communications biology · 2025Article
- Binocularly-driven competing neural responses and the perceptual resolution of color.Journal of vision · 2021Article
- Interocular Grouping in Perceptual Rivalry Localized with fMRI.Brain topography · 2021Article
- Conflict defined by global gestalt can modulate binocular rivalry suppression.Journal of vision · 2020Article
- Perceptual rivalry across animal species.The Journal of comparative neurology · 2020Review
- A functional theory of bistable perception based on dynamical circular inference.PLoS computational biology · 2020Article
- Idiosyncratic preferences in transparent motion and binocular rivalry are dissociable.Journal of vision · 2020Article
- Cholinergic Modulation of Binocular Vision.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2020Article
- Methods to assess binocular rivalry with periodic stimuli.Journal of mathematical neuroscience · 2020Article
- A hierarchical model of perceptual multistability involving interocular grouping.Journal of computational neuroscience · 2020Article
- Grouping ambiguous neural representations: neither identical chromaticity (the stimulus) nor color (the percept) is necessary.Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision · 2020Article
- Does feature integration affect resolution of multiple simultaneous forms of ambiguity?Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision · 2020Article
- Eye swapping temporally modulates potency of continuous flash suppression.Journal of vision · 2020Article
- Perceptual resolution of ambiguous neural representations for form and chromaticity.Journal of vision · 2019Article
- Temporal dynamics of binocular integration in primary visual cortex.Journal of vision · 2019Article
- Stimulus rivalry and binocular rivalry share a common neural substrate.Journal of vision · 2018Article
- Perceptual resolution of color for multiple chromatically ambiguous objects.Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision · 2018Article
- Attention model of binocular rivalry.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017Article
- Chromatic interocular-switch rivalry.Journal of vision · 2017Article
- Training of binocular rivalry suppression suggests stimulus-specific plasticity in monocular and binocular visual areas.Scientific reports · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
When corresponding areas of the two eyes view dissimilar images, stable perception gives way to visual competition wherein perceptual awareness alternates between those images. Moreover, a given image can remain visually dominant for several seconds at a time even when the competing images are swapped between the eyes multiple times each second. This perceptual stability across eye swaps has led to the widespread belief that this unique form of visual competition, dubbed stimulus rivalry, is governed by eye-independent neural processes at a purely binocular stage of cortical processing. We tested this idea by investigating the influence of stimulus rivalry on the buildup of the threshold elevation aftereffect, a form of contrast adaptation thought to transpire at early cortical stages that include eye-specific neural activity. Weaker threshold elevation aftereffects were observed when the adapting image was engaged in stimulus rivalry than when it was not, indicating diminished buildup of adaptation during stimulus-rivalry suppression. We then confirmed that this reduction occurred, in part, at eye-specific neural stages by showing that suppression of an image at a given moment specifically diminished adaptation associated with the eye viewing the image at that moment. Considered together, these results imply that eye-specific neural events at early cortical processing stages contribute to stimulus rivalry. We have developed a computational model of stimulus rivalry that successfully implements this idea.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.