Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23609768›Full record

ArticlePsychopharmacology2013

Differential effects on natural reward processing in rats after repeated heroin.

Ewa Galaj, Ivonne Cruz, Jordan Schachar, Matthew Koziolek, Robert Ranaldi

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Psychopharmacology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ewa GalajThe Graduate Center, City University of New York, New York, NY, USA.
Ivonne Cruz
Jordan Schachar
Matthew Koziolek
Robert Ranaldi
Queens College, CUNY · USCity University of New York · USThe Graduate Center, CUNY · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleHeroin users report reward deficits as well as reward enhancements (to drug stimuli). To better understand the causal relation between chronic heroin and alterations in natural reward processing, we used experimental techniques in animal models.

methodsSeparate groups of rats were trained in several food reward paradigms: conditioned place preference (CPP), food-reinforced lever pressing under a progressive ratio schedule of reinforcement, free feeding, and lever pressing with conditioned reinforcement. After training, the rats were subjected to 10 daily heroin (2 mg/kg) or saline vehicle injections and tested at 3, 15, and 30 days post-treatment.

resultsRepeated heroin treatment abolished the CPP and significantly reduced break points for food reward at 3, 15, and 30 days post-treatment. Repeated heroin did not affect free feeding. Finally, repeated heroin significantly enhanced responding for a food-based conditioned reinforcer.

conclusionsRepeated heroin decreases the attractiveness of food-associated cues and reduces motivation to work for natural reward. However, it appears to enhance natural conditioned reward processes that involve the acquisition of novel responding. Thus, repeated heroin appears to produce differential effects on natural reward processing depending on the nature of the reward-directed behavior.

Indexed as

Reinforcement ScheduleAnimalsConditioning, OperantHeroinMaleMotor ActivityRatsRats, Long-EvansHeroin

Identifiers

PMID23609768
OpenAlexW2171136196

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.