ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2013
Consenting for risk in common ENT operations: an evidence-based approach.
Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Comparison of the Structured Consent Process Using Modified Delphi Technique with the Standard Process in Obtaining Informed Consent for Procedures in ENT by PHASE III MBBS Students.Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pre-operative consent discussion and documentation is an essential process that should follow relevant guidance, and include all serious or frequently occurring risks. We assessed the appropriateness of consent for grommet insertion, tonsillectomy, septoplasty, and hemithyroidectomy, by comparing the risks listed in current consenting practice to published complication data for the relevant operation. 120 consent forms and associated clinic letters were analysed. A literature search identified published complication data for comparison. There was great variation in consent practice for each operation type, and poor correlation with published risk incidence. Only 'bleeding' post-tonsillectomy and 'recurrent laryngeal nerve injury' post hemithyroidectomy were listed in 100 % of relevant cases. Common and serious complications were frequently omitted from forms. The number and type of risks consented for a procedure significantly differed between consultant and non-consultant staff. The potential requirement for blood transfusion was discussed in only 20 % of tonsillectomy cases. Currently, the pre-operative consent for commonly performed ENT operations does not reflect operative risks. Consenting for surgical complications should be evidence based using published or personal data. A change in the consent process is required to protect patient autonomy and meet both legal and professional body requirements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
23609098What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.