Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23609056›Full record

ArticleTargeted oncology2014

Comparison of acute toxicity and mortality after two different dosing regimens of high-dose interleukin-2 for patients with metastatic melanoma.

Laura M Alwan, Kenneth Grossmann, Daniel Sageser, Joan Van Atta, Neeraj Agarwal, Jeffrey A Gilreath

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Targeted oncology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Repurposing approved drugs for cancer therapy.British medical bulletin · 2021
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Advanced biomaterials for cancer immunotherapy.Acta pharmacologica Sinica · 2020
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Fueling chimeric antigen receptor T cells with cytokines.American journal of cancer research · 2020
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Delivery technologies for cancer immunotherapy.Nature reviews. Drug discovery · 2019
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Laura M AlwanDepartment of Pharmacy Services, University of Washington Medical Center/Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, 825 Eastlake Ave. East, Seattle, WA, 98109, USA, lmiars@uw.edu.
Kenneth Grossmann
Daniel Sageser
Joan Van Atta
Neeraj Agarwal
Jeffrey A Gilreath
University of Utah Hospital · USHuntsman Cancer Institute · USSeattle Cancer Care Alliance · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We compared acute toxicity, drug exposure, in-hospital mortality, and inpatient length of stay between two currently recommended dosing protocols (from the National Comprehensive Cancer Network Guidelines) of high-dose interleukin-2 (IL-2) treatment for patients with metastatic melanoma. Patients with metastatic melanoma who received high-dose IL-2 treatment between 2003 and 2010 were identified. Chemotherapy orders, electronic medical records, paper medical charts, and patient discharge summaries were reviewed retrospectively. We identified 13 patients who had received 600,000 units/kilogram (kg)/dose and 15 patients who had received 720,000 units/kg/dose. Patients in the 720,000 units/kg/dose group had a higher rate of grade 3 and 4 bilirubin elevations (34 vs. 12 %), weight gain (any grade, 96 vs. 89 %), and thrombocytopenia (any grade, 75 vs. 65 %). Patients receiving the higher dose also experienced more dose-limiting neurotoxicity (45 vs. 23 %), large-volume diarrhea (15 vs. 0 %), and hepatotoxicity (7 vs. 0 %). There was no in-hospital mortality during treatment in either group. The average length of stay was similar between both groups (5 days, SD = 1 for both groups), and the median cumulative IL-2 exposure was similar between both groups for the first course (10.1 vs.10.5 million units/kg) and for all courses (approximately 11-12 million units/kg). Both high-dose IL-2 protocols had comparable in-hospital mortality and cumulative IL-2 exposure. The 720,000 units/kg/dose dosing scheme did not shorten the length of stay but did lead to greater acute toxicity. Therefore, as a result, we recommend 600,000 units/kg/dose when deciding between the two regimens.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCarcinoma, Renal CellDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsFemaleHospital MortalityHumansInterleukin-2Kidney NeoplasmsLength of StayMaleMelanomaMiddle AgedNeoplasm MetastasisInterleukin-2

Identifiers

PMID23609056
OpenAlexW2050529682

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.