Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23608976›Full record

ReviewEnvironmental science and pollution research international2013

Solution by dilution?--A review on the pollution status of the Yangtze River.

Tilman Floehr, Hongxia Xiao, Björn Scholz-Starke, Lingling Wu, Junli Hou, Daqiang Yin, Xiaowei Zhang, Rong Ji, Xingzhong Yuan, Richard Ottermanns and 3 more

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Toxicity of sediment cores from Yangtze River estuary to zebrafish (Danio rerio) embryos.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Tilman FloehrInstitute for Environmental Research, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, 52074, Germany, floehr@bio5.rwth-aachen.de.
Hongxia Xiao
Björn Scholz-Starke
Lingling Wu
Junli Hou
Daqiang Yin
Xiaowei Zhang
Rong Ji
Xingzhong Yuan
Richard Ottermanns
Martina Roß-Nickoll
Andreas Schäffer
Henner Hollert

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Yangtze River has been a source of life and prosperity for the Chinese people for centuries and is a habitat for a remarkable variety of aquatic species. But the river suffers from huge amounts of urban sewage, agricultural effluents, and industrial wastewater as well as ship navigation wastes along its course. With respect to the vast amounts of water and sediments discharged by the Yangtze River, it is reasonable to ask whether the pollution problem may be solved by simple dilution. This article reviews the past two decades of published research on organic pollutants in the Yangtze River and several adjacent water bodies connected to the main stream, according to a holistic approach. Organic pollutant levels and potential effects of water and sediments on wildlife and humans, measured in vitro, in vivo, and in situ, were critically reviewed. The contamination with organic pollutants, including polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), organochlorine pesticides (OCPs), polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins/polychlorinated dibenzofurans, polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs), perfluorinated compounds (PFCs), and others, of water and sediment along the river was described. Especially Wuhan section and the Yangtze Estuary exhibited stronger pollution than other sections. Bioassays, displaying predominantly the endpoints mutagenicity and endocrine disruption, applied at sediments, drinking water, and surface water indicated a potential health risk in several areas. Aquatic organisms exhibited detectable concentrations of toxic compounds like PCBs, OCPs, PBDEs, and PFCs. Genotoxic effects could also be assessed in situ in fish. To summarize, it can be stated that dilution reduces the ecotoxicological risk in the Yangtze River, but does not eliminate it. Keeping in mind an approximately 14 times greater water discharge compared to the major European river Rhine, the absolute pollution mass transfer of the Yangtze River is of severe concern for the environmental quality of its estuary and the East China Sea. Based on the review, further research needs have been identified.

Indexed as

AnimalsBenzofuransChinaDibenzofurans, PolychlorinatedDioxinsEnvironmental MonitoringHalogenated Diphenyl EthersHumansHydrocarbons, ChlorinatedPesticidesPolychlorinated BiphenylsPolycyclic Aromatic HydrocarbonsRiversWastewaterWater Pollutants, ChemicalWater Pollution, ChemicalBenzofuransdibenzo(1,4)dioxinDibenzofurans, PolychlorinatedDioxinsHalogenated Diphenyl EthersHydrocarbons, ChlorinatedPesticidesPolychlorinated BiphenylsPolycyclic Aromatic HydrocarbonsWastewaterWater Pollutants, Chemical

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.