Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23606875›Full record

ArticleEvidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM2013

Effect of GutGard in the Management of Helicobacter pylori: A Randomized Double Blind Placebo Controlled Study.

Sreenivasulu Puram, Hyung Chae Suh, Seung Un Kim, Bharathi Bethapudi, Joshua Allan Joseph, Amit Agarwal, Venkateswarlu Kudiganti

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. To evaluate of the effect of adding licorice to the standard treatment regimen of Helicobacter pylori.The Brazilian journal of infectious diseases : an official publication of the Brazilian Society of Infectious Diseases
    Trial
  6. Beyond Antibiotics: Alternative Strategies TargetingExpert reviews in molecular medicine · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Anti-Laboratory animal research · 2020
    Article
  14. In Silico and In Vitro Anti-Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019
    Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Sreenivasulu PuramD2L Pharma Research Centre, Bangalore 560 037, India.
Hyung Chae Suh
Seung Un Kim
Bharathi Bethapudi
Joshua Allan Joseph
Amit Agarwal
Venkateswarlu Kudiganti
Natural Remedies (India) · INBangalore Diabetes Centre · INKorea Polytechnic University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A randomized, double blind placebo controlled study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of GutGard (root extract of Glycyrrhiza glabra) in the management of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) gastric load. Participants diagnosed with H. pylori infection were randomly assigned to two groups to orally receive 150 mg of GutGard (n = 55) or placebo (n = 52) once daily for 60 days. H. pylori infection was assessed using (13)C-urea breath test ((13)C-UBT) at days 0, 30, and 60. Stool Antigen test (HpSA) was also performed on days 0, 30, and 60. Repeated measures of analysis of variance (RMANOVA), chi-square, and Fisher's exact probability tests were used to compare the treatment outcomes. A significant interaction effect between group and time (P = 0.00) and significant difference in mean Delta Over Baseline (DOB) values between GutGard (n = 50) and placebo (n = 50) treated groups after intervention period were observed. On day 60, the results of HpSA test were negative in 28 subjects (56%) in GutGard treated group whereas in placebo treated group only 2 subjects (4%) showed negative response; the difference between the groups was statistically significant. On day 60, the results of (13)C-UBT were negative in 24 (48%) in GutGard treated group and the difference between the groups was statistically significant. The findings suggest GutGard is effective in the management of H. pylori.

Identifiers

PMID23606875
PMCPMC3623263
OpenAlexW2030680388

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.