Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23605465›Full record

ReviewCurrent cardiology reports2013

Treatment of infrapopliteal critical limb ischemia in 2013: the wound perfusion approach.

Matthew C Bunte, Mehdi H Shishehbor

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current cardiology reports, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02624674 (Multi-spectral Imaging to Assess Wounds in Peripheral Vascular Disease Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02624674 phase3unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2015, after this paper: background citation

Multi-spectral Imaging to Assess Wounds in Peripheral Vascular Disease Patients

TypeinterventionalSponsorUnity Health TorontoRan2015 to 2016Enrolled20ConditionsPeripheral Vascular Disease PatientArmsMulti-spectral Imaging Device (MSID)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Matthew C BunteRobert & Suzanne Tomsich Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Heart and Vascular Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Mail code J3-5, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA.
Mehdi H Shishehbor
Cleveland Clinic · US

Funding

Clinical and Translational Science Collaborative of ClevelandKL2TR000440 · NCATS · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI KONSTAN, MICHAEL W. · 2012 to 2016
$11.1M
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR000440
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The primary goals of treatment for critical limb ischemia (CLI) are alleviation of ischemic rest pain, healing of arterial insufficiency ulcers, and improving quality of life. These goals are directed toward preventing limb loss and CLI-related mortality. Arterial revascularization serves as the foundation of a contemporary approach to promote amputation-free survival. Mounting evidence supports a wound-directed angiosome revascularization approach, increasingly achieved with endovascular techniques. Innovations in technology and wound-perfusion strategy have advanced patient care and are accelerating the pace of CLI treatment. The evolving angiosome revascularization approach has been augmented with a multidisciplinary wound care strategy that deserves particular emphasis. These state-of-the-art advances in CLI management are reported herein with considerations for the future treatment of CLI.

Indexed as

Amputation, SurgicalAngioplastyArterial Occlusive DiseasesDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleHumansIschemiaLimb SalvageLower ExtremityMalePerfusionPopliteal ArteryRisk FactorsTreatment OutcomeWound Healing

Identifiers

PMID23605465
OpenAlexW2088466028

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.