ArticleClinical rheumatology2013
Safety of biologics approved for treating rheumatoid arthritis: analysis of spontaneous reports of adverse events.
Article in Clinical rheumatology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Worldwide, 3-Year, Post-Marketing Surveillance Experience with Tofacitinib in Rheumatoid Arthritis.Rheumatology and therapy · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite the effectiveness of biologics approved for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis, they have been associated with serious adverse events (AEs). Biologics are used under close supervision of health care professionals. In Portugal, they are legally required to report AEs occurring during the treatment. This study aims at investigating post-marketing safety monitoring data of biologics in Portugal by comparing the frequency of spontaneously reported adverse events between 2009 and 2011 with the frequency of such events in the summary of the product characteristics of each biologic. Sales data for biologics were obtained from IMS Health and converted into defined daily doses/1,000 inhabitants/day in order to estimate a proportion of the population treated. The frequency of AEs was estimated as the percentage of patients in which an AE may have occurred. The use of each biologic was estimated for adalimumab at 1,439 patients/year, etanercept 1,944 patients/year, and infliximab 3,211 patients/year. A total of 992 AEs were reported: 207 for adalimumab, 199 for etanercept, and 586 for infliximab. Of the 515 different spontaneously reported AEs, 194 were included for comparisons with the SPCs. Of those, 31 (16 %) were similarly frequent, and 163 (84.0 %) occurred less frequently compared with SPCs' data. These results suggest an insufficient post-marketing safety monitoring of biologics in Portugal.
Indexed as
Identifiers
23604594What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.