Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23604469›Full record

ArticleTAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik2013

Bayesian inference of mixed models in quantitative genetics of crop species.

Fabyano Fonseca E Silva, José Marcelo Soriano Viana, Vinícius Ribeiro Faria, Marcos Deon Vilela de Resende

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Hierarchical modelling of variance components makes analysis of resolvable incomplete block designs more efficient.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2024
    Article
  3. Genome-Wide Association Study Statistical Models: A Review.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Fabyano Fonseca E SilvaDepartamento de Estatística, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, 36570-000 Viçosa, MG, Brazil.
José Marcelo Soriano Viana
Vinícius Ribeiro Faria
Marcos Deon Vilela de Resende

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objectives of this study were to implement a Bayesian framework for mixed models analysis in crop species breeding and to exploit alternatives for informative prior elicitation. Bayesian inference for genetic evaluation in annual crop breeding was illustrated with the first two half-sib selection cycles in a popcorn population. The Bayesian framework was based on the Just Another Gibbs Sampler software and the R2jags package. For the first cycle, a non-informative prior for the inverse of the variance components and an informative prior based on meta-analysis were used. For the second cycle, a non-informative prior and an informative prior defined as the posterior from the non-informative and informative analyses of the first cycle were used. Regarding the first cycle, the use of an informative prior from the meta-analysis provided clearly distinct results relative to the analysis with a non-informative prior only for the grain yield. Regarding the second cycle, the results for the expansion volume and grain yield showed differences among the three analyses. The differences between the non-informative and informative prior analyses were restricted to variance components and heritability. The correlations between the predicted breeding values from these analyses were almost perfect.

Indexed as

Models, GeneticBayes TheoremBreedingCrops, AgriculturalQuantitative Trait, HeritableZea mays

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.