ArticleIntensive care medicine2013
Clinical measures for increased creatinine clearances and suboptimal antibiotic dosing.
Article in Intensive care medicine, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Strategies to reduce curative antibiotic therapy in intensive care units (adult and paediatric).Intensive care medicine · 2015Guideline
- Therapeutic drug monitoring-based dose optimisation of piperacillin and meropenem: a randomised controlled trial.Intensive care medicine · 2014Trial
- Initial dosing of intermittent vancomycin in adults: estimation of dosing interval in relation to dose and renal function.European journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice · 2021Article
- Screening of patients with augmented renal clearance in ICU: taking into account the CKD-EPI equation, the age, and the cause of admission.Annals of intensive care · 2015Article
- Evaluation of a protocol for vancomycin administration in critically patients with and without kidney dysfunction.BMC anesthesiology · 2015Observational
- Tigecycline use in critically ill patients: a multicentre prospective observational study in the intensive care setting.Intensive care medicine · 2014Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
23604134What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.