Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23603828›Full record

ReviewEnvironmental health perspectives2013

Improving the human hazard characterization of chemicals: a Tox21 update.

Raymond R Tice, Christopher P Austin, Robert J Kavlock, John R Bucher

Abstract readEvaluation StudyReview
In one paragraph

Review in Environmental health perspectives, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 290 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
290citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

290 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Functional Genomics Screening inEnvironmental science & technology · 2026
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Emerging advances in intestinal models for in vitro preclinical research.American journal of physiology. Gastrointestinal and liver physiology · 2025
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Integrating network analysis and machine learning to elucidate chemical-induced pancreatic toxicity in zebrafish embryos.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2025
    Article
  20. Article

230 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Raymond R TiceDivision of the National Toxicology Program, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA.
Christopher P Austin
Robert J Kavlock
John R Bucher

Funding

Research and testing activities for the National Toxicology Program (NTP)ZIAES103227 · NIEHS · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES · PI TICE, RAYMOND · 2014 to 2014
$514k
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn 2008, the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences/National Toxicology Program, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's National Center for Computational Toxicology, and the National Human Genome Research Institute/National Institutes of Health Chemical Genomics Center entered into an agreement on "high throughput screening, toxicity pathway profiling, and biological interpretation of findings." In 2010, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) joined the collaboration, known informally as Tox21.

objectivesThe Tox21 partners agreed to develop a vision and devise an implementation strategy to shift the assessment of chemical hazards away from traditional experimental animal toxicology studies to one based on target-specific, mechanism-based, biological observations largely obtained using in vitro assays. DISCUSSION: Here we outline the efforts of the Tox21 partners up to the time the FDA joined the collaboration, describe the approaches taken to develop the science and technologies that are currently being used, assess the current status, and identify problems that could impede further progress as well as suggest approaches to address those problems.

conclusionTox21 faces some very difficult issues. However, we are making progress in integrating data from diverse technologies and end points into what is effectively a systems-biology approach to toxicology. This can be accomplished only when comprehensive knowledge is obtained with broad coverage of chemical and biological/toxicological space. The efforts thus far reflect the initial stage of an exceedingly complicated program, one that will likely take decades to fully achieve its goals. However, even at this stage, the information obtained has attracted the attention of the international scientific community, and we believe these efforts foretell the future of toxicology.

Indexed as

AnimalsComputational BiologyEnvironmental PollutantsGenomicsHazardous SubstancesHumansNational Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (U.S.)National Institutes of Health (U.S.)Toxicity TestsToxicologyUnited StatesUnited States Environmental Protection AgencyUnited States Food and Drug AdministrationEnvironmental PollutantsHazardous Substances

Identifiers

PMID23603828
PMCPMC3701992

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.