Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23603792›Full record

ArticleTransplantation2013

Effects of cellular sensitization and donor age on acute rejection and graft function after deceased-donor kidney transplantation.

Donald E Hricik, Emilio D Poggio, Kenneth J Woodside, Naragaju Sarabu, Edmund Q Sanchez, James A Schulak, Aparna Padiyar, Peter S Heeger, Joshua J Augustine

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Transplantation, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Optimizing the Use of Deceased Donor Kidneys at Risk of Discard: A Clinical Practice Guideline.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2025
    Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Donald E HricikDivision of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA. dhricik@aol.com
Emilio D Poggio
Kenneth J Woodside
Naragaju Sarabu
Edmund Q Sanchez
James A Schulak
Aparna Padiyar
Peter S Heeger
Joshua J Augustine
University Hospitals Case Medical Center · USCleveland Clinic · US

Funding

Noninvasive Markers and Transplant Outcome in HumansU01AI063594 · NIAID · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI HEEGER, PETER SCOTT · 2004 to 2022
$66.5M
NIAID NIH HHS U01 AI063594
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAllografts from older donors may be more immunogenic than those from younger donors. Pretransplantation cellular sensitization may interact with advanced donor age to increase the risk of immune injury after deceased-donor kidney transplantation.

methodsThe outcomes of 118 consecutive deceased-donor kidney transplant recipients with available pretransplantation donor-stimulated enzyme-linked immunosorbent spot (ELISPOT) assays for interferon gamma were analyzed retrospectively to determine the impact of cellular sensitization and other clinical variables, including donor age, on the incidence of acute rejection (AR) in the first year after deceased-donor transplantation and on estimated glomerular filtration rate 12 months after transplantation.

resultsThe incidence of AR was higher in patients with positive pretransplantation ELISPOT assays versus those with negative assays (36% vs. 14%, P=0.009). Logistic regression indicated that the combination of donor age 50 years or older and a positive pretransplantation ELISPOT assay was more strongly associated with AR (odds ratio, 12.1; confidence interval, 1.1-133) than either variable alone. Estimated glomerular filtration 12 months after transplantation was highest in ELISPOT-negative patients receiving kidneys from donors younger than 50 years and lowest in ELISPOT-positive recipients with donors 50 years or older.

conclusionThe combination of advanced donor age and pretransplantation cellular sensitization increases the risk of AR and poor graft function after deceased-donor kidney transplantation beyond the risk associated with each factor alone.

Indexed as

Tissue DonorsAcute DiseaseAdultAgedAge FactorsEnzyme-Linked Immunospot AssayFemaleGlomerular Filtration RateGraft RejectionHumansInterferon-gammaKidney TransplantationLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedInterferon-gamma

Identifiers

PMID23603792
PMCPMC4076048
OpenAlexW2042941210

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.