Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23603653›Full record

Trial reportPediatric emergency care2013

Using the pediatric emergency department to deliver tailored safety messages: results of a randomized controlled trial.

Wendy C Shields, Eileen M McDonald, Lara McKenzie, Mei-Cheng Wang, Allen R Walker, Andrea C Gielen

Abstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Pediatric emergency care, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Pilot Trial of an Emergency Department-based Intervention to Promote Child Passenger Safety Best Practices.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2019
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. The Role of Health Kiosks: Scoping Review.JMIR medical informatics · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Wendy C ShieldsCenter for Injury Research and Policy, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA. wshields@jhsph.edu
Eileen M McDonald
Lara McKenzie
Mei-Cheng Wang
Allen R Walker
Andrea C Gielen

Funding

THE JOHNS HOPKINS INJURY CONTROL RESEARCH CENTERR49CE001507 · CE · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI GIELEN, ANDREA C · 2009 to 2013
$4.4M
The Johns Hopkins Center For Injury Research and PolicyR49CE002466 · CE · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI GIELEN, ANDREA C · 2014 to 2018
$3.9M
Community Partnerships for Child SafetyR01HD059216 · NICHD · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI GIELEN, ANDREA C · 2008 to 2012
$3.4M
Brief Child Safety Interventions in Emergency DepartmentR01HD042777 · NICHD · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI GIELEN, ANDREA C · 2002 to 2004
$1.4M
NCIPC CDC HHS 5R49CE001507NCIPC CDC HHS R49 CE002466NICHD NIH HHS 5R01HD042777-03NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD042777NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD059216
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study aimed to evaluate the impact of a computer kiosk intervention on parents' self-reported safety knowledge as well as observed child safety seat, smoke alarm use, and safe poison storage and to compare self-reported versus observed behaviors.

methodsA randomized controlled trial with 720 parents of young children (4 months to 5 years) was conducted in the pediatric emergency department of a level 1 pediatric trauma center. Enrolled parents received tailored safety information (intervention) or generic information (control) from a computer kiosk after completing a safety assessment. Parents were telephoned 4 to 6 months after the intervention to assess self-reported safety knowledge and behaviors; in-home observations were made 1 week after the telephone interview for a subset of 100 randomly selected participants. Positive and negative predictive values were compared between the intervention and control groups.

resultsThe intervention group had significantly higher smoke alarm (82% vs. 78%) and poison storage (83% vs 78%) knowledge scores. The intervention group was more likely to report correct child safety seat use (odds ratio, 1.36; 95% confidence interval, 1.05-1.77; P = 0.02). Observed safety behaviors were lower than self-reported use for both groups. No differences were found between groups for positive or negative predictive values.

conclusionsThese results add to the limited literature on the impact of computer tailoring home safety information. Knowledge gains were evident 4 months after intervention. Discrepancies between observed and self-reported behavior are concerning because the quality of a tailored intervention depends on the accuracy of participant self-reporting. Improved measures should be developed to encourage accurate reporting of safety behaviors.

Indexed as

Emergency Service, HospitalHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticePediatricsRisk Reduction BehaviorSafetyAdolescentAdultChildChild, PreschoolChild Restraint SystemsDrug StorageFemaleHumansInfantInterviews as TopicMaleSmoke

Identifiers

PMID23603653
PMCPMC3674582

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.