Trial reportPediatric emergency care2013
Using the pediatric emergency department to deliver tailored safety messages: results of a randomized controlled trial.
Trial report in Pediatric emergency care, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multimodal Intervention and Child Passenger Safety Guideline Adherence in Young Children: A Sequential, Multiple-Assignment, Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA network open · 2025Trial
- Pilot Trial of an Emergency Department-based Intervention to Promote Child Passenger Safety Best Practices.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2019Trial
- Empowering Women's Prenatal Communication: Does Literacy Matter?Journal of health communication · 2015Trial
- Effectiveness of web-based tailored advice on parents' child safety behaviors: randomized controlled trial.Journal of medical Internet research · 2014Trial
- Identifying gaps in technology-based intervention prevention programs and ways to foster learning and engagement with parents using serious games.Frontiers in public health · 2025Review
- Assessment of the effectiveness of parent-targeted interventions for the use of child restraint systems: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Translational pediatrics · 2022Article
- The Role of Health Kiosks: Scoping Review.JMIR medical informatics · 2022Article
- Outcomes after injury prevention counselling in a paediatric office setting: a 25-year review.BMJ paediatrics open · 2018Article
- Targeting modulates audiences' brain and behavioral responses to safe sex video ads.Social cognitive and affective neuroscience · 2016Article
- Characteristics of users of a tailored, interactive website for parents and its impact on adolescent vaccination attitudes and uptake.BMC research notes · 2015Article
- A smartphone app to communicate child passenger safety: an application of theory to practice.Health education research · 2015Article
- A spatial analysis of functional outcomes and quality of life outcomes after pediatric injury.Injury epidemiologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThis study aimed to evaluate the impact of a computer kiosk intervention on parents' self-reported safety knowledge as well as observed child safety seat, smoke alarm use, and safe poison storage and to compare self-reported versus observed behaviors.
methodsA randomized controlled trial with 720 parents of young children (4 months to 5 years) was conducted in the pediatric emergency department of a level 1 pediatric trauma center. Enrolled parents received tailored safety information (intervention) or generic information (control) from a computer kiosk after completing a safety assessment. Parents were telephoned 4 to 6 months after the intervention to assess self-reported safety knowledge and behaviors; in-home observations were made 1 week after the telephone interview for a subset of 100 randomly selected participants. Positive and negative predictive values were compared between the intervention and control groups.
resultsThe intervention group had significantly higher smoke alarm (82% vs. 78%) and poison storage (83% vs 78%) knowledge scores. The intervention group was more likely to report correct child safety seat use (odds ratio, 1.36; 95% confidence interval, 1.05-1.77; P = 0.02). Observed safety behaviors were lower than self-reported use for both groups. No differences were found between groups for positive or negative predictive values.
conclusionsThese results add to the limited literature on the impact of computer tailoring home safety information. Knowledge gains were evident 4 months after intervention. Discrepancies between observed and self-reported behavior are concerning because the quality of a tailored intervention depends on the accuracy of participant self-reporting. Improved measures should be developed to encourage accurate reporting of safety behaviors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.