Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23603062›Full record

ReviewJournal of physiology, Paris2013

At the interface of the auditory and vocal motor systems: NIf and its role in vocal processing, production and learning.

Brian Lewandowski, Alexei Vyssotski, Richard H R Hahnloser, Marc Schmidt

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of physiology, Paris, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. A feedforward inhibitory premotor circuit for auditory-vocal interactions in zebra finches.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  4. The multi-dimensional nature of vocal learning.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2021
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Memory circuits for vocal imitation.Current opinion in neurobiology · 2020
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Motor origin of precise synaptic inputs onto forebrain neurons driving a skilled behavior.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2015
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Auditory-vocal mirroring in songbirds.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2014
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Brian LewandowskiDepartment of Biology and Neuroscience Graduate Group, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States.
Alexei Vyssotski
Richard H R Hahnloser
Marc Schmidt

Funding

FUNCTIONAL ORGANIZATION OF THE SONG MOTOR CONTROL SYSTEMR01DC006102 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI SCHMIDT, MARC F · 2003 to 2012
$2.8M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC006102
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Communication between auditory and vocal motor nuclei is essential for vocal learning. In songbirds, the nucleus interfacialis of the nidopallium (NIf) is part of a sensorimotor loop, along with auditory nucleus avalanche (Av) and song system nucleus HVC, that links the auditory and song systems. Most of the auditory information comes through this sensorimotor loop, with the projection from NIf to HVC representing the largest single source of auditory information to the song system. In addition to providing the majority of HVC's auditory input, NIf is also the primary driver of spontaneous activity and premotor-like bursting during sleep in HVC. Like HVC and RA, two nuclei critical for song learning and production, NIf exhibits behavioral-state dependent auditory responses and strong motor bursts that precede song output. NIf also exhibits extended periods of fast gamma oscillations following vocal production. Based on the converging evidence from studies of physiology and functional connectivity it would be reasonable to expect NIf to play an important role in the learning, maintenance, and production of song. Surprisingly, however, lesions of NIf in adult zebra finches have no effect on song production or maintenance. Only the plastic song produced by juvenile zebra finches during the sensorimotor phase of song learning is affected by NIf lesions. In this review, we carefully examine what is known about NIf at the anatomical, physiological, and behavioral levels. We reexamine conclusions drawn from previous studies in the light of our current understanding of the song system, and establish what can be said with certainty about NIf's involvement in song learning, maintenance, and production. Finally, we review recent theories of song learning integrating possible roles for NIf within these frameworks and suggest possible parallels between NIf and sensorimotor areas that form part of the neural circuitry for speech processing in humans.

Indexed as

Acoustic StimulationAnimalsAuditory PathwaysLearningSongbirdsTelencephalonVocalization, Animal

Identifiers

PMID23603062
PMCPMC4532675

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.