ArticleHuman immunology2013
Molecular basis of cross-species reactivities of human versus porcine CTLA-4.
Article in Human immunology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
- Structure Prediction and Expression of Modified rCTLA4-Ig as a Blocker for B7 Molecules.Iranian journal of pharmaceutical research : IJPR · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The binding motif of human CTLA-4 is well known to be MYPPPY and for porcine CTLA-4 the binding motif is LYPPPY. Is this single amino acid difference of methionine (M) versus leucine (L) critical for the CTLA-4 binding? Recently, we have reported that the recombinant soluble porcine CTLA-4 was incapable of binding to human CD80. In this study we mutated L to M in the binding motif of the soluble porcine CTLA-4 and mutated M to L in the binding motif of the soluble human CTLA-4. We then analyzed how these mutations affected the binding affinity of the mutants to both porcine and human CD80(+) cells. The soluble porcine CTLA-4-L97M mutant partially lost its binding affinity to porcine CD80 compared to the wild-type and conferred very weak binding ability to human CD80. These results indicate that the L in the binding motif of porcine CTLA-4 is important for determining its binding ability to porcine CD80. Wild-type soluble human CTLA-4 binds to both human and porcine CD80 with comparable affinity, however, the soluble human CTLA-4-M97L mutant almost lost its binding ability to human CD80 and increased its binding ability to porcine CD80. These results indicate that M in the human CTLA-4 binding motif is extremely critical for its binding to human CD80. Those data suggest that the human CTLA-4 based recombinant protein drugs such as human CTLA-4-Ig can be used and/or tested in a porcine model. Conversely, the use of porcine CTLA-4 based recombinant protein drugs such as porcine CTLA-4-Ig is restricted to swine models. The difference in binding specificity of CTLA-4 observed in this study may be useful for studies such as pig to nonhuman primate xeno-transplantation. Porcine CTLA-4- and human CTLA-4-M97L mutant-based recombinant protein drugs can be used to specifically block the direct presentation by donor antigen presenting cells in pig to nonhuman primate xeno-transplantation. Human CTLA-4-M97L mutant-based recombinant protein drugs will be more ideal as it is without immunogenicity to human being.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.