ArticleAmerican journal of human genetics2013
FOXP2 targets show evidence of positive selection in European populations.
Article in American journal of human genetics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
35 citing papers in PubMed, 79 citations in OpenAlex.
- MUTAGENESISFORGE: A FRAMEWORK FOR MODELING CODON-LEVEL MUTATIONAL BIASES AND CALCULATING dN/dS.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Genome-wide relaxation of selection and the evolution of the island syndrome in Orkney voles.Genome research · 2024Article
- The adaptive evolution of cancer driver genes.BMC genomics · 2023Article
- Discovery of 42 genome-wide significant loci associated with dyslexia.Nature genetics · 2022Article
- Efficient gene delivery into the embryonic chicken brain using neuron-specific promoters and in ovo electroporation.BMC biotechnology · 2022Article
- The role of contactin-associated protein-like 2 in neurodevelopmental disease and human cerebral cortex evolution.Frontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2022Review
- Hearing loss genes reveal patterns of adaptive evolution at the coding and non-coding levels in mammals.BMC biology · 2021Article
- A Likelihood Approach for Uncovering Selective Sweep Signatures from Haplotype Data.Molecular biology and evolution · 2020Article
- A population-based approach for gene prioritization in understanding complex traits.Human genetics · 2020Article
- Article
- The untold stories of the speech gene, theGenes & cancer · 2018Review
- Is the Capacity for Vocal Learning in Vertebrates Rooted in Fish Schooling Behavior?Evolutionary biology · 2018Review
- REST, a master regulator of neurogenesis, evolved under strong positive selection in humans and in non human primates.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- Review
- Evolution of language: Lessons from the genome.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2017Article
- Autoimmunity as a Driving Force of Cognitive Evolution.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2017Article
- The evolutionary history of genes involved in spoken and written language: beyond FOXP2.Scientific reports · 2016Article
- Detecting signatures of positive selection associated with musical aptitude in the human genome.Scientific reports · 2016Article
- Common Genetic Variants in FOXP2 Are Not Associated with Individual Differences in Language Development.PloS one · 2016Article
- An Evolution-Based Screen for Genetic Differentiation between Anopheles Sister Taxa Enriches for Detection of Functional Immune Factors.PLoS pathogens · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Forkhead box P2 (FOXP2) is a highly conserved transcription factor that has been implicated in human speech and language disorders and plays important roles in the plasticity of the developing brain. The pattern of nucleotide polymorphisms in FOXP2 in modern populations suggests that it has been the target of positive (Darwinian) selection during recent human evolution. In our study, we searched for evidence of selection that might have followed FOXP2 adaptations in modern humans. We examined whether or not putative FOXP2 targets identified by chromatin-immunoprecipitation genomic screening show evidence of positive selection. We developed an algorithm that, for any given gene list, systematically generates matched lists of control genes from the Ensembl database, collates summary statistics for three frequency-spectrum-based neutrality tests from the low-coverage resequencing data of the 1000 Genomes Project, and determines whether these statistics are significantly different between the given gene targets and the set of controls. Overall, there was strong evidence of selection of FOXP2 targets in Europeans, but not in the Han Chinese, Japanese, or Yoruba populations. Significant outliers included several genes linked to cellular movement, reproduction, development, and immune cell trafficking, and 13 of these constituted a significant network associated with cardiac arteriopathy. Strong signals of selection were observed for CNTNAP2 and RBFOX1, key neurally expressed genes that have been consistently identified as direct FOXP2 targets in multiple studies and that have themselves been associated with neurodevelopmental disorders involving language dysfunction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.