Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23602463›Full record

SynthesisThe Brazilian journal of infectious diseases : an official publication of the Brazilian Society of Infectious Diseases

Sulbactam-based therapy for Acinetobacter baumannii infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Haiqing Chu, Lan Zhao, Minggui Wang, Yang Liu, Tao Gui, Jingbo Zhang

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Brazilian journal of infectious diseases : an official publication of the Brazilian Society of Infectious Diseases. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Sulbactam for carbapenem-resistantJAC-antimicrobial resistance · 2025
    Review
  5. Review
  6. New Agents Are Coming, and So Is the Resistance.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  7. Optimizing Treatment for Carbapenem-ResistantInfection & chemotherapy · 2024
    Review
  8. Treatment and Management ofInfection and drug resistance · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Enhanced bacterial killing with a combination of sulbactam/minocycline against dual carbapenemase-producing Acinetobacter baumannii.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2023
    Article
  11. Navigating Available Treatment Options for Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii-calcoaceticus Complex Infections.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2023
    Review
  12. A fresh pH-responsive imipenem-loaded nanocarrier againstFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Growth kinetics of multipleF1000Research · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Haiqing ChuDepartment of Respiratory Disease, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Lan Zhao
Minggui Wang
Yang Liu
Tao Gui
Jingbo Zhang
Fudan University · CNTongji University · CNHuashan Hospital · CNShanghai Pulmonary Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA number of studies have reported on the effectiveness of sulbactam-based therapies for Acinetobacter baumannii infection; however, there is little evidence that sulbactam-based therapies are more or less effective than alternative therapies. Unfortunately, there is a distinct lack of high quality data (i.e., from randomized controlled trials) available on this issue. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing the efficacy of sulbactam-based and non-sulbactam-based regimens in the treatment of A. baumannii infection.

methodsWe searched PubMed, MEDLINE, Biomedical Central, Google Scholar, the China National Knowledge Infrastructure, the Cochrane library, and the Directory of Open Access using the terms "sulbactam and baumannii" or "maxtam and baumannii". Randomized controlled trials, controlled clinical studies, and cohort studies were considered for inclusion. The primary outcome was the clinical response rate for sulbactam-based therapy vs comparator therapies.

resultsFour studies (1 prospective, 3 retrospective) were included in the meta-analysis. Sulbactam was given in combination with ampicillin, carbapenem, or cefoperazone (n=112 participants). Comparator drugs included colistin, cephalosporins, anti-pseudomonas penicillins, fluoroquinolones, minocycline/doxycycline, aminoglycosides, tigecycline, polymyxin, imipenem/cilastatin, and combination therapy (n=107 participants). The combined clinical response rate odds ratio did not significantly favor sulbactam-based therapy over comparator therapy (odds ratio=1.054, 95% confidence interval=0.550-2.019, p=0.874), nor did any of the individual study odds ratios.

conclusionsThe available evidence suggests that sulbactam-based therapy may be similarly efficacious to alternative antimicrobial therapies for the treatment of A. baumannii infection. Further research on this issue is warranted given the limited availability of data from high quality/randomized controlled trials.

Indexed as

Acinetobacter baumanniiAcinetobacter InfectionsAnti-Bacterial AgentsDrug Therapy, CombinationHumansSulbactamTreatment OutcomeAnti-Bacterial AgentsSulbactamAcinetobacter baumanniiInfectionMeta-analysisSulbactamSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID23602463
PMCPMC9428054
OpenAlexW2170959038

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.