Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23601324›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2013

Regulating the many to benefit the few: role of weak small RNA targets.

Daniel Jost, Andrzej Nowojewski, Erel Levine

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Optimal census by quorum sensing.PLoS computational biology · 2015
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Daniel JostDepartment of Physics and FAS Center for Systems Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Andrzej Nowojewski
Erel Levine
Harvard University · USCenter for Systems Biology · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Small regulatory RNAs are central players in the regulation of many cellular processes across all kingdoms of life. Experiments in mouse and human have shown that a typical small RNA may regulate the expression of many different genes, suggesting that small RNAs act as global regulators. It is noted though that most targets respond only weakly to the presence of the small RNA. At the same time, evidence in bacteria and animals suggest that the phenotypes associated with small RNA mutants are only due to a few of their targets. Here we assume that targets regulated by a small RNA to control function is in fact small, and propose that the role of the many other weak targets is to confer robustness to the regulation of these few principal targets. Through mathematical modeling we show that auxiliary targets may significantly buffer both number and kinetic fluctuations of the principal targets, with only minor slowdown in the kinetics of response. Analysis of genomic data suggests that auxiliary targets experience a nonspecific evolutionary pressure, playing a role at the system level. Our work is of importance for studies on small RNA functions, and impacts on the understanding of small RNA evolution.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalAnimalsBacteriaEvolution, MolecularGenetic LociHumansKineticsRNA, MessengerRNA Processing, Post-TranscriptionalRNA, Small UntranslatedStochastic ProcessesRNA, MessengerRNA, Small Untranslated

Identifiers

PMID23601324
PMCPMC3627871
OpenAlexW2038212727

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.