Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23601129›Full record

Trial reportBritish journal of clinical pharmacology2013

The combined use of disease activity and infliximab serum trough concentrations for early prediction of (non-)response to infliximab in rheumatoid arthritis.

Bart J F van den Bemt, Alfons A den Broeder, Gert-Jan Wolbink, Aatke van den Maas, Yechiel A Hekster, Piet L C M van Riel, H Bart Benraad, Frank H J van den Hoogen

Abstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Towards Personalized Medicine in Rheumatoid Arthritis.Open access rheumatology : research and reviews · 2024
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Assessing Immunogenicity of Biologic Drugs in Inflammatory Joint Diseases: Progress Towards Personalized Medicine.BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy · 2022
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Bart J F van den BemtDepartment of Pharmacy, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Alfons A den Broeder
Gert-Jan Wolbink
Aatke van den Maas
Yechiel A Hekster
Piet L C M van Riel
H Bart Benraad
Frank H J van den Hoogen

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimEarly prediction of (non-)response to infliximab therapy can improve therapeutic benefit by avoiding unnecessary periods of high disease activity during ineffective therapy. This prospective cohort study therefore aimed to study the predictive value of (1) disease activity alone and (2) infliximab serum trough concentrations in addition to disease activity 6 weeks after start of treatment for achieving low disease activity after 6 months.

methodsDisease activity and infliximab serum trough concentrations were assessed in all rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients at 2, 6 and 26 weeks after initiation of infliximab therapy. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and Youden indices were used to calculate specificity for prediction of good response after 6 months while aiming for maximum sensitivity.

resultsFifty-seven consecutive RA patients starting with infliximab therapy were included. After 6 months, 15 (26%, 95 % CI 15, 38%) patients reached good European League against Rheumatism (EULAR) response. A disease activity score <4.2 at 6 weeks after initiation of therapy was a moderate predictor for reaching EULAR response after 6 months (sensitivity 100%, specificity 49%). Infliximab serum trough concentrations (>2.5 mg l(-1)) as predictor complimentary to disease activity (<4.2) slightly increased the specificity from 49% to 54% without changing the sensitivity (100%). As 39% of the patients did not fulfill at least one of these criteria at week 6, these patients could already be switched to another therapy after 6 weeks.

conclusionsThe combination of disease activity and infliximab serum trough concentrations could be a fair predictor to identify early (after 6 weeks) patients who have insufficient response after 6 months of therapy.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalSeverity of Illness IndexAntibodies, MonoclonalAntirheumatic AgentsArthritis, RheumatoidCohort StudiesDrug ResistanceFemaleHumansInfliximabMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsProspective StudiesTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeAntibodies, MonoclonalAntirheumatic AgentsInfliximabinfliximabinfliximab trough concentrationsprediction responserheumatoid arthritis

Identifiers

PMID23601129
PMCPMC3845317

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.