Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23601084›Full record

Trial reportBritish journal of clinical pharmacology2013

Peripheral selectivity of the novel cannabinoid receptor antagonist TM38837 in healthy subjects.

Linda E Klumpers, Marianne Fridberg, Marieke L de Kam, Paul B Little, Niels Ole Jensen, Hendrik D Kleinloog, Christian E Elling, Joop M A van Gerven

Open access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 75 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Peripheral CB1 receptor blockade acts as a memory enhancer through a noradrenergic mechanism.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. The Peripheral Cannabinoid Receptor Type 1 (CBMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Toxins · 2019
    Review
  18. A patent update on cannabinoid receptor 1 antagonists (2015-2018).Expert opinion on therapeutic patents · 2019
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Linda E KlumpersCentre for Human Drug Research, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Marianne Fridberg
Marieke L de Kam
Paul B Little
Niels Ole Jensen
Hendrik D Kleinloog
Christian E Elling
Joop M A van Gerven
Centre for Human Drug Research · NLTechnical University of Denmark · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimCannabinoid receptor type 1 (CB1 ) antagonists show central side effects, whereas beneficial effects are most likely peripherally mediated. In this study, the peripherally selective CB1 antagonist TM38837 was studied in humans.

methodsThis was a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, crossover study. On occasions 1-4, 24 healthy subjects received 5 × 4 mg THC with TM38837 100 mg, 500 mg or placebo, or placebos only. During occasion 5, subjects received placebo TM38837 + THC with rimonabant 60 mg or placebo in parallel groups. Blood collections and pharmacodynamic (PD) effects were assessed frequently. Pharmacokinetics (PK) and PD were quantified using population PK-PD modelling.

resultsThe TM38837 plasma concentration profile was relatively flat compared with rimonabant. TM38837 showed an estimated terminal half-life of 771 h. THC induced effects on VAS feeling high, body sway and heart rate were partly antagonized by rimonabant 60 mg [-26.70% [90% confidence interval (CI) -40.9, -12.6%]; -7.10%, (90%CI -18.1, 5.3%); -7.30%, (90% CI -11.5%, -3.0%) respectively] and TM38837 500 mg [-22.10% (90% CI -34.9, -9.4%); -12.20% (90% CI -21.6%, -1.7%); -8.90% (90% CI -12.8%, -5.1%) respectively]. TM38837 100 mg had no measurable feeling high or body sway effects and limited heart rate effects.

conclusionsRimonabant showed larger effects than TM38837, but the heart rate effects were similar. TM38837 100 mg had no impact on CNS effects, suggesting that this dose does not penetrate the brain. This TM38837 dose is predicted to be at least equipotent to rimonabant with regard to metabolic disorders in rodent models. These results provide support for further development of TM38837 as a peripherally selective CB1 antagonist for indications such as metabolic disorders, with a reduced propensity for psychiatric side effects.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultBlood PressureCannabinoid Receptor AgonistsCannabinoid Receptor AntagonistsCross-Over StudiesDose-Response Relationship, DrugDouble-Blind MethodDronabinolHealthy VolunteersHeart RateHumansMaleMiddle AgedModels, BiologicalPeripheral Nervous SystemCannabinoid Receptor AgonistsCannabinoid Receptor AntagonistsDronabinolPiperidinesPyrazolesReceptor, Cannabinoid, CB1RimonabantTM38837cannabinoid receptor type 1 antagonistperipheral CB1 antagonistpharmacokineticsPK−PDrimonabantTM38837

Identifiers

PMID23601084
PMCPMC3845308
OpenAlexW2128514367

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.