Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23600827›Full record

Trial reportClinical and experimental immunology2013

Regulatory T cell phenotype and function 4 years after GAD-alum treatment in children with type 1 diabetes.

M Pihl, L Akerman, S Axelsson, M Chéramy, M Hjorth, R Mallone, J Ludvigsson, R Casas

Open access · greenAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical and experimental immunology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Combination Immunotherapy for Type 1 Diabetes.Current diabetes reports · 2017
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Non-antigenic and antigenic interventions in type 1 diabetes.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2014
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

M PihlDivision of Pediatrics, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
L Akerman
S Axelsson
M Chéramy
M Hjorth
R Mallone
J Ludvigsson
R Casas
Linköping University · SEAssistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris · FRLinköping University Hospital · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD)(65) formulated with aluminium hydroxide (GAD-alum) was effective in preserving insulin secretion in a Phase II clinical trial in children and adolescents with recent-onset type 1 diabetes. In addition, GAD-alum treated patients increased CD4(+) CD25(hi) forkhead box protein 3(+) (FoxP3(+)) cell numbers in response to in-vitro GAD(65) stimulation. We have carried out a 4-year follow-up study of 59 of the original 70 patients to investigate long-term effects on the frequency and function of regulatory T cells after GAD-alum treatment. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells were stimulated in vitro with GAD65 for 7 days and expression of regulatory T cell markers was measured by flow cytometry. Regulatory T cells (CD4(+) CD25(hi) CD127(lo)) and effector T cells (CD4(+) CD25(-) CD127(+)) were further sorted, expanded and used in suppression assays to assess regulatory T cell function after GAD-alum treatment. GAD-alum-treated patients displayed higher frequencies of in-vitro GAD(65) -induced CD4(+) CD25(+) CD127(+) as well as CD4(+) CD25(hi) CD127(lo) and CD4(+) FoxP3(+) cells compared to placebo. Moreover, GAD(65) stimulation induced a population of CD4(hi) cells consisting mainly of CD25(+) CD127(+) , which was specific of GAD-alum-treated patients (16 of 25 versus one of 25 in placebo). Assessment of suppressive function in expanded regulatory T cells revealed no difference between GAD-alum- and placebo-treated individuals. Regulatory T cell frequency did not correlate with C-peptide secretion throughout the study. In conclusion, GAD-alum treatment induced both GAD(65) -reactive CD25(+) CD127(+) and CD25(hi) CD127(lo) cells, but no difference in regulatory T cell function 4 years after GAD-alum treatment.

Indexed as

Adjuvants, ImmunologicAdolescentAlum CompoundsAutoantigensChildDiabetes Mellitus, Type 1FemaleFollow-Up StudiesGlutamate DecarboxylaseHumansImmunosuppression TherapyInterleukin-2 Receptor alpha SubunitInterleukin-7 Receptor alpha SubunitLymphocyte ActivationMaleTime FactorsAdjuvants, ImmunologicAlum Compoundsaluminum sulfateAutoantigensGlutamate Decarboxylaseglutamate decarboxylase 2IL2RA protein, humanInterleukin-2 Receptor alpha SubunitInterleukin-7 Receptor alpha Subunit

Identifiers

PMID23600827
PMCPMC3646438
OpenAlexW1564038613

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.