Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23600596›Full record

ArticleAddiction (Abingdon, England)2013

Shared risk: who engages in substance use with American homeless youth?

Harold D Green, Kayla de la Haye, Joan S Tucker, Daniela Golinelli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Addiction (Abingdon, England), 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Predictors of Retention in an Alcohol and Risky Sex Prevention Program for Homeless Young Adults.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2018
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Crystal methamphetamine initiation among street-involved youth.The American journal of drug and alcohol abuse · 2014
    Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Harold D GreenRAND Corporation, 1776 Main Street, Santa Monica, CA 90401, USA. hgreen@rand.org
Kayla de la Haye
Joan S Tucker
Daniela Golinelli

Funding

DRUG USE, SOCIAL CONTEXT, AND HIV RISK IN HOMELESS YOUTHR01DA020351 · NIDA · RAND CORPORATION · PI TUCKER, JOAN S · 2007 to 2010
$3.1M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA020351NIDA NIH HHS R01DA020351
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsTo identify characteristics of social network members with whom homeless youth engage in drinking and drug use.

designA multi-stage probability sample of homeless youth completed a social network survey.

settingForty-one shelters, drop-in centers and known street hangouts in Los Angeles County.

participantsA total of 419 homeless youth, aged 13-24 years (mean age = 20.09, standard deviation = 2.80). MEASUREMENTS: Respondents described 20 individuals in their networks, including their substance use and demographics, and the characteristics of the relationships they shared, including with whom they drank and used drugs. Dyadic, multi-level regressions identified predictors of shared substance use.

findingsShared drinking was more likely to occur with recent sex partners [odds ratio (OR) = 2.64, confidence interval (CI): 1.67, 4.18], drug users (OR = 4.57, CI: 3.21, 6.49), sexual risk takers (OR = 1.71, CI: 1.25, 2.33), opinion leaders (OR = 1.69, CI: 1.42, 2.00), support providers (OR = 1.41, CI: 1.03, 1.93) and popular people (those with high degree scores in the network) (OR = 1.07, CI: 1.01, 1.14). Shared drug use was more likely to occur with recent sex partners (OR = 2.44, CI: 1.57, 3.80), drinkers (OR = 4.53, CI: 3.05, 6.74), sexual risk takers (OR = 1.51, CI: 1.06, 2.17), opinion leaders (OR = 1.24, CI: 1.03, 1.50), support providers (OR = 1.83, CI: 1.29, 2.60) and popular people (OR = 1.16, CI: 1.08, 1.24).

conclusionsHomeless youth in the United States are more likely to drink or use drugs with those who engage in multiple risk behaviors and who occupy influential social roles (popular, opinion leaders, support providers, sex partners). Understanding these social networks may be helpful in designing interventions to combat substance misuse.

Indexed as

Interpersonal RelationsAdolescentAlcohol DrinkingFemaleHomeless YouthHumansLos AngelesMaleRisk-TakingSocial SupportSubstance-Related DisordersYoung AdultDyadic analysishomeless youthpeerssocial networkssubstance use

Identifiers

PMID23600596
PMCPMC3742579

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.