Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23599899›Full record

ArticleGenes2013

The replication fork: understanding the eukaryotic replication machinery and the challenges to genome duplication.

Adam R Leman, Eishi Noguchi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genes, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Stochastic modeling of epigenetic memory.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Adam R LemanDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19102, USA.
Eishi Noguchi

Funding

Studies of the Swi1-Swi3 Replication Fork Protection ComplexR01GM077604 · NIGMS · DREXEL UNIVERSITY · PI NOGUCHI, EISHI · 2008 to 2012
$1.6M
The Role of Timeless Tipin in Telomere Length Control and MaintenanceF31AG035480 · NIA · DREXEL UNIVERSITY · PI LEMAN, ADAM ROBERT · 2009 to 2010
$55k
NIA NIH HHS F31 AG035480NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM077604
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Eukaryotic cells must accurately and efficiently duplicate their genomes during each round of the cell cycle. Multiple linear chromosomes, an abundance of regulatory elements, and chromosome packaging are all challenges that the eukaryotic DNA replication machinery must successfully overcome. The replication machinery, the "replisome" complex, is composed of many specialized proteins with functions in supporting replication by DNA polymerases. Efficient replisome progression relies on tight coordination between the various factors of the replisome. Further, replisome progression must occur on less than ideal templates at various genomic loci. Here, we describe the functions of the major replisome components, as well as some of the obstacles to efficient DNA replication that the replisome confronts. Together, this review summarizes current understanding of the vastly complicated task of replicating eukaryotic DNA.

Indexed as

checkpointdifficult-to-replicate sitesDNA replicationfork barriersgenome stabilityreplication forkreplisome

Identifiers

PMID23599899
PMCPMC3627427

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.