ArticleExperimental and therapeutic medicine2013
Tidal volume in animal models of hemorrhagic and endotoxic shock.
Article in Experimental and therapeutic medicine, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to examine the characteristics of lung, kidney and small intestine injury caused by early resuscitation from hemorrhagic shock (HS) and endotoxic shock (ES) when ventilating with different tidal volumes (Vts). The study also considered the determination of the appropriate Vt for use in mechanical ventilation (MV) during treatment for shock. Resuscitated rabbits were ventilated with varying Vts for 120 min following 60 min of HS or ES. The histopathology, ultrastructure and apoptotic index (AI) of the lung, kidney and small intestine were then measured. Organs from the high-Vt groups (VT=12-15 ml/kg) showed the highest pathological scores (PSs; P<0.05). For HS, the renal PS and AI of the HS-M group (Vt=8-10 ml/kg)were lower than those of the HS-L group (Vt=4-6 ml/kg) and the lung PS and AI of the HS-C (control) group were lower compared with those of the HS-M group. For ES, the lung PS of the ES-L group was lower compared with that of the ES-M group (Vt=8-10 ml/kg) and the lung AI of the ES-C (control) group was lower compared with that of the ES-L group (Vt=4-6 ml/kg). When ventilated with the same Vt, ES resulted in higher PSs in the lung and intestine and a lower renal PS (P<0.05) than HS. MV was not recommended for either shock type. When it was necessary for MV to be applied, low Vt (4-6 ml/kg) protected the lung in ES. Moderate Vt (8-10 ml/kg) may be relatively safe to use for HS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.