Trial reportWorld journal of gastroenterology2013
Modulatory effects of Bifidobacterium longum BB536 on defecation in elderly patients receiving enteral feeding.
Trial report in World journal of gastroenterology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 53 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy and Safety of Probiotics, Prebiotics and Synbiotics for the Treatment of Functional Constipation in Children: Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins · 2026Pooled it
- Nonpharmacologic treatment for elderly with constipation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Efficacy and Safety of Probiotics in Geriatric Patients with Constipation: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.The journal of nutrition, health & aging · 2023Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of probiotics in Parkinson's constipation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022Pooled it
- Prevention of Radiotherapy-Induced Enteropathy by Probiotics (PREP): Double-Blind Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2024Trial
- Probiotic Bifidobacterium lactis Probio-M8 treated and prevented acute RTI, reduced antibiotic use and hospital stay in hospitalized young children: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.European journal of nutrition · 2022Trial
- Trial
- Bifidobacterium Breve A1 Supplementation Improved Cognitive Decline in Older Adults with Mild Cognitive Impairment: An Open-Label, Single-Arm Study.The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease · 2019Trial
- Probiotic-Driven Metabolic Transformation in Dark Tea: Enhanced Bioactives and Gut Microbiota Modulation Underlie Its Alleviation Effect Against Constipation.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Synbiotic combination ofGut microbes reports · 2025Article
- Exploring the interaction and impact of probiotic and commensal bacteria on vitamins, minerals and short chain fatty acids metabolism.Microbial cell factories · 2024Review
- Article
- Revisiting the Intestinal Microbiome and Its Role in Diarrhea and Constipation.Microorganisms · 2023Review
- Review
- Crosstalk between the Gut Microbiome and Colonic Motility in Chronic Constipation: Potential Mechanisms and Microbiota Modulation.Nutrients · 2022Review
- Effects ofEvidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2022Article
- Association between Gut Microbiota and Infant's Temperament in the First Year of Life in a Chinese Birth Cohort.Microorganisms · 2020Article
- Membrane filter method to study the effects of Lactobacillus acidophilus and Bifidobacterium longum on fecal microbiota.Microbiology and immunology · 2015Article
- Probiotic Bifidobacterium longum alters gut luminal metabolism through modification of the gut microbial community.Scientific reports · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimTo investigate the effects of the probiotic Bifidobacterium longum BB536 on the health management of elderly patients receiving enteral feeding.
methodsTwo double-blind, placebo-controlled trials were performed with long-term inpatients receiving enteral tube feeding at Kitakyushu Hospital Group, Fukuoka, Japan. BB536 was administered as BB536-L and BB536-H powders that contained approximately 2.5 × 10¹⁰ and 5 × 10¹⁰ cfu of BB536, respectively. In the first trial, 83 patients (age range: 67-101 years) were randomized into 2 groups that received placebo (placebo group) or BB536-H (BB536 group) powders. In the second trial, 123 patients (age range: 65-102 years) were randomized into 3 groups, and each group received placebo (placebo group), BB536-L (BB536-L group), or BB536-H (BB536-H group) powders. Each patient received the study medication for 16 wk after 1 wk of pre-observation. Fecal samples were collected from each patient prior to and after the intervention during Trial 2. Clinical observations included body temperature, occurrence of infection, frequency of defecation, and fecal microbiota.
resultsNo significant changes were observed in the frequency of defecation for either treatment in Trial 1. However, a significant change was noted in the BB536-L group (P = 0.0439) in Trial 2 but not in the placebo or BB536-H groups. Subgroup analyses based on the frequency of defecation for each patient during the pre-observation period for both trials revealed significant increases in bowel movements in patients with a low frequency of defecation and significant decreases in the bowel movements of patients with a high frequency of defecation during the intervention period in the BB536 groups. The combination of Trials 1 and 2 data revealed a modulatory effect of BB536 ingestion on the changes in bowel movements. Significantly increased bowel movements were observed in patients in the low frequency subgroup with significant intergroup differences (P < 0.01). Significantly decreased bowel movements were observed in patients in the high subgroup, but no significant intergroup differences were observed compared with the placebo group. BB536 ingestion increased the prevalence of normally formed stools. BB536 intake also significantly (P < 0.01) increased the cell numbers of bifidobacteria in fecal microbiota, and significant intergroup differences were observed at week 16. No adverse events were reported in any group.
conclusionOur results suggest that BB536 ingestion modulated the intestinal environment and may have improved the health care of elderly patients receiving enteral feeding.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.