Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23599422›Full record

ArticleDNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes2013

Next-generation annotation of prokaryotic genomes with EuGene-P: application to Sinorhizobium meliloti 2011.

Erika Sallet, Brice Roux, Laurent Sauviac, Marie-Francoise Jardinaud, Sébastien Carrère, Thomas Faraut, Fernanda de Carvalho-Niebel, Jérôme Gouzy, Pascal Gamas, Delphine Capela and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in DNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed
14.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed, 90 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Prokaryotic Genome Annotation.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Erika SalletINRA, Laboratoire des Interactions Plantes-Microorganismes-LIPM, UMR 441, Castanet-Tolosan F-31326, France.
Brice Roux
Laurent Sauviac
Marie-Francoise Jardinaud
Sébastien Carrère
Thomas Faraut
Fernanda de Carvalho-Niebel
Jérôme Gouzy
Pascal Gamas
Delphine Capela
Claude Bruand
Thomas Schiex
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRLaboratoire de Génétique Cellulaire · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The availability of next-generation sequences of transcripts from prokaryotic organisms offers the opportunity to design a new generation of automated genome annotation tools not yet available for prokaryotes. In this work, we designed EuGene-P, the first integrative prokaryotic gene finder tool which combines a variety of high-throughput data, including oriented RNA-Seq data, directly into the prediction process. This enables the automated prediction of coding sequences (CDSs), untranslated regions, transcription start sites (TSSs) and non-coding RNA (ncRNA, sense and antisense) genes. EuGene-P was used to comprehensively and accurately annotate the genome of the nitrogen-fixing bacterium Sinorhizobium meliloti strain 2011, leading to the prediction of 6308 CDSs as well as 1876 ncRNAs. Among them, 1280 appeared as antisense to a CDS, which supports recent findings that antisense transcription activity is widespread in bacteria. Moreover, 4077 TSSs upstream of protein-coding or non-coding genes were precisely mapped providing valuable data for the study of promoter regions. By looking for RpoE2-binding sites upstream of annotated TSSs, we were able to extend the S. meliloti RpoE2 regulon by ∼3-fold. Altogether, these observations demonstrate the power of EuGene-P to produce a reliable and high-resolution automatic annotation of prokaryotic genomes.

Indexed as

Genome, BacterialRegulonSoftwareChromosome MappingMolecular Sequence AnnotationNitrogen FixationOpen Reading FramesRNA, UntranslatedSigma FactorSinorhizobium melilotiTranscription Initiation SiteRNA, UntranslatedSigma Factorsporulation-specific sigma factorsgenome annotationprokaryotesrhizobiumRNA-Seq

Identifiers

PMID23599422
PMCPMC3738161
OpenAlexW2127757002

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.