Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23599373›Full record

ReviewReproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.)2014

Amniotic fluid: the use of high-dimensional biology to understand fetal well-being.

Beena D Kamath-Rayne, Heather C Smith, Louis J Muglia, Ardythe L Morrow

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Beena D Kamath-Rayne1Perinatal Institute, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Heather C Smith
Louis J Muglia
Ardythe L Morrow

Funding

Ohio Interdisciplinary Women's Health Career TrainingK12HD051953 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI · PI TSEVAT, JOEL · 2005 to 2014
$4.2M
NICHD NIH HHS K12 HD051953
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Our aim was to review the use of high-dimensional biology techniques, specifically transcriptomics, proteomics, and metabolomics, in amniotic fluid to elucidate the mechanisms behind preterm birth or assessment of fetal development. We performed a comprehensive MEDLINE literature search on the use of transcriptomic, proteomic, and metabolomic technologies for amniotic fluid analysis. All abstracts were reviewed for pertinence to preterm birth or fetal maturation in human subjects. Nineteen articles qualified for inclusion. Most articles described the discovery of biomarker candidates, but few larger, multicenter replication or validation studies have been done. We conclude that the use of high-dimensional systems biology techniques to analyze amniotic fluid has significant potential to elucidate the mechanisms of preterm birth and fetal maturation. However, further multicenter collaborative efforts are needed to replicate and validate candidate biomarkers before they can become useful tools for clinical practice. Ideally, amniotic fluid biomarkers should be translated to a noninvasive test performed in maternal serum or urine.

Indexed as

Gene Expression ProfilingHealth StatusMetabolomicsProteomicsSystems BiologyAmniotic FluidBiomarkersFemaleFetusGenetic MarkersGestational AgeHumansInfant, PrematurePredictive Value of TestsPregnancyPremature BirthBiomarkersGenetic Markersamniotic fluidpreterm birthproteomicssystems biologytranscriptomics

Identifiers

PMID23599373
PMCPMC3857760

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.