Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23598849›Full record

ArticleJournal of oncology practice2012

Do high symptom scores trigger clinical actions? An audit after implementing electronic symptom screening.

Hsien Seow, Jonathan Sussman, Lorraine Martelli-Reid, Greg Pond, Daryl Bainbridge

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of oncology practice, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 62 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
62citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02844608 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2016, after this paper: background citation

Quality of Life Assessment in Routine Clinical Oncology Practice at the University Hospital of Besancon

TypeinterventionalSponsorCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de BesanconRan2016 to 2019Enrolled152ConditionsBreast Cancer, Colorectal Cancer, Lung CancerArmsQuality of Life Questionnaires
NCT04456920 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Pain Monitoring After Breast Biopsy: Benefit of E-health

TypeinterventionalSponsorInstitut du Cancer de Montpellier - Val d'AurelleRan2021 to 2024Enrolled193ConditionsBreast Cancer, Biopsy WoundArmsphone consultation, e-PRO self-completed via connected objects (tablet/phone), visit
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

62 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Symptom Monitoring With Patient-Reported Outcomes During Routine Cancer Treatment: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2016
    Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Pain at the end of life in patients with cancer: a population-based study on prevalence, relief, and the role of pain assessment.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  9. Canadian oncology nursing journal = Revue canadienne de nursing oncologique · 2026
    Article
  10. Distress Screening in Parents of Children with Cancer During Active Treatment: A Pilot Study.Canadian oncology nursing journal = Revue canadienne de nursing oncologique · 2026
    Article
  11. The effect of yoga therapy consultations on symptom burden in inpatient cancer care: a retrospective observational study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hsien SeowDepartment of Oncology, McMaster University, 699 Concession St, Hamilton, Ontario L8V 5C2, Canada. seowh@mcmaster.ca
Jonathan Sussman
Lorraine Martelli-Reid
Greg Pond
Daryl Bainbridge

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeStandardized, electronic, symptom assessment is purported to help identify symptom needs. However, little research examines clinical processes related to symptom management, such as whether patients with worsening symptoms receive clinical actions more often. This study examined whether patient visits with higher symptom scores are associated with higher rates of symptom documentation in the chart and symptom-specific actions being taken.

methodsRetrospective chart reviews on cancer patient visits at a regional cancer center. An electronic Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS), a validated tool to measure symptoms, was implemented center-wide to standardize symptom screening at every patient visit. The independent variable was ESAS scores for pain and shortness of breath, categorized by severity: 0 (none), 1-3, 4-6, 7-10 (severe). Outcomes included symptom documentation in the chart on the visit date and symptom-related action(s) taken within 1 week.

resultsNine hundred twelve visits were identified. Pain and shortness of breath were documented in 51.8% and 29.7% of charts, and a related-action occurred in 16.9% and 3.9% of charts, respectively. As ESAS severity score category increased from none to severe, the proportion of visits with pain documented increased significantly (36.9%, 49.2%, 55.2%, and 71.4%; P < .001). Likewise, as ESAS score severity increased, the proportion of visits with a pain-related action increased significantly (4.2%, 10.6%, 21.3%, and 37.0%; P < .001). Trends were similar for shortness of breath.

conclusionResults show a positive association between higher symptom scores and higher rates of documentation and clinical actions taken. However, symptom-related actions were documented in a minority of visits in which symptoms were noted as severe.

Indexed as

Severity of Illness IndexAgedBreast NeoplasmsDocumentationDyspneaFemaleHumansLung NeoplasmsMaleMedical AuditMiddle AgedNeeds AssessmentNeoplasmsOntarioPainPain Measurement

Identifiers

PMID23598849
PMCPMC3500488

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.