ArticleJournal of oncology practice2012
Clinical practice guidelines for cancer care: utilization and expectations of the practicing oncologist.
Article in Journal of oncology practice, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development of a Rule-Based Knowledge Base for Digitalization of Standard Operating Procedures on Radiotherapy in Breast Cancer.Oncology · 2026Article
- A qualitative exploration of the pathway to diagnosis and treatment of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck with perineural spread.Cancer medicine · 2024Article
- Multidisciplinary Treatment of Non-Spine Bone Metastases: Results of a Modified Delphi Consensus Process.Clinical and translational radiation oncology · 2022Article
- Personal Payments from Pharmaceutical Companies to Authors of Oncology Clinical Practice Guidelines.The oncologist · 2021Article
- Assessment of guideline adherence in breast cancer management among oncologists in Nigeria.Ecancermedicalscience · 2021Article
- Trends in Female Representation on NCCN Guideline Panels.Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN · 2020Article
- Improving communication between the general practitioner and the oncologist: a key role in coordinating care for patients suffering from cancer.BMC cancer · 2020Article
- Guidelines for sub-Saharan Africa: a call for evidence.The Lancet. Oncology · 2018Article
- A quantitative method for assessment of prescribing patterns using electronic health records.PloS one · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
ASCO produces guidelines for oncologists, utilizing a systematic review process. Although this resource-intense process results in authoritative and widely cited guidelines, they can cover only a few specific clinical issues. Hence, the ASCO guidelines presently do not fully address many clinical situations. Expanding the scope of ASCO guidelines will require major revisions to the guidelines development process. Changes likely to improve the process include establishing disease-specific committees composed of content experts, improving methods to resolve conflicts of interest, simplifying steps to engage members to suggest topics for new guidelines, and linking guidelines utilization with quality indices. In a time of rapid change in practice and research in cancer, ASCO can play a pivotal role in patient care through major revisions to guideline development, accessibility, and integration with quality metrics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.