Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23598482›Full record

ReviewVaccine2013

Desirability and feasibility of a vaccine against cytomegalovirus.

Paul Griffiths, Stanley Plotkin, Edward Mocarski, Robert Pass, Mark Schleiss, Philip Krause, Stephanie Bialek

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Vaccine, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed
11.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 90 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Preventing Infection by Human Cytomegalovirus.The Journal of infectious diseases · 2020
    Review
  8. Genotyping of Cytomegalovirus from Symptomatic Infected Neonates in Iraq.The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2019
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Single-Cell Transcriptome Analysis of CD34Frontiers in microbiology · 2019
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Whither vaccines?The Journal of infection · 2017
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Paul GriffithsUniversity College London, UK. p.griffiths@ucl.ac.uk
Stanley Plotkin
Edward Mocarski
Robert Pass
Mark Schleiss
Philip Krause
Stephanie Bialek
California University of Pennsylvania · USCenters for Disease Control and Prevention · USEmory University · USUnited States Food and Drug Administration · USUniversity College London · GBUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham · USUniversity of Minnesota · US

Funding

CYTOMEGALOVIRUS DNA REPLICATION AND RECOMBINATIONR01AI020211 · NIAID · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI EDWARD S MOCARSKI, EDWARD S. · 1985 to 2021
$5.9M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI020211Wellcome Trust 078332
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Publication of a report from the Institute of Medicine in 2000 showing that a vaccine against cytomegalovirus (CMV) would likely be cost saving was very influential and encouraged the clinical evaluation of candidate vaccines. The major objective of a CMV vaccination program would be to reduce disease caused by congenital CMV infection, which is the leading viral cause of sensorineural hearing loss and neurodevelopmental delay. CMV has challenges as a vaccine target because it is a herpesvirus, it persists lifelong despite host immunity, infected individuals can be reinfected with new strains, overt disease occurs in those with immature or impaired immune systems and persons with this infection do not usually report symptoms. Nevertheless, natural immunity against CMV provides some protection against infection and disease, natural history studies have defined the serological and molecular biological techniques needed for endpoints in future clinical trials of vaccines and CMV is not highly communicable, suggesting that it may not be necessary to achieve very high levels of population immunity through vaccination in order to affect transmission. Three phase 2 CMV vaccine studies have been completed in the last 3 years and all report encouraging outcomes. A key international meeting was organized by the Food and Drug Administration in January 2012 at which interested parties from regulatory bodies, industry and academia discussed and prioritised designs for phase 2 and phase 3 clinical trials. Vaccines able to prevent primary infection with CMV and to boost the immune response of those already infected are desirable. The major target populations for a CMV vaccine include women of childbearing age and adolescents. Toddlers represent another potential population, since an effect of vaccine in this age group could potentially decrease transmission to adults. In addition, prospective recipients of transplants and patients with AIDS would be expected to benefit.

Indexed as

Cytomegalovirus VaccinesClinical Trials as TopicCytomegalovirus InfectionsDisease Transmission, InfectiousFemaleHumansPregnancyPregnancy Complications, InfectiousRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicUnited StatesUnited States Food and Drug AdministrationCytomegalovirus Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID23598482
PMCPMC5672921
OpenAlexW1992520385

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.