Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23598047›Full record

ArticleBone2013

Deferoxamine expedites consolidation during mandibular distraction osteogenesis.

Alexis Donneys, Sagar S Deshpande, Catherine N Tchanque-Fossuo, Kelsey L Johnson, Jordan T Blough, Joseph E Perosky, Kenneth M Kozloff, Peter A Felice, Noah S Nelson, Aaron S Farberg and 2 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bone, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. [Application and research progress of mandibular distraction osteogenesis in craniofacial microsomia].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Importance of bone health in bone lengthening.Journal of the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alexis DonneysCraniofacial Research Laboratory, Plastic Surgery Section, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Sagar S Deshpande
Catherine N Tchanque-Fossuo
Kelsey L Johnson
Jordan T Blough
Joseph E Perosky
Kenneth M Kozloff
Peter A Felice
Noah S Nelson
Aaron S Farberg
Benjamin Levi
Steven R Buchman
University of Michigan–Ann Arbor · US

Funding

TRAINING GRANT IN TRAUMA, BURN AND WOUND HEALING RESEARCT32GM008616 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI BUCHMAN, STEVEN R, CHUNG, KEVIN C · 1997 to 2025
$3.1M
Translational Optimization of Bone Regeneration in the Irradiated MandibleR01CA125187 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI BUCHMAN, STEVEN R · 2007 to 2017
$2.8M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA125187NCI NIH HHS R01 CA 12587-01NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM008616NIGMS NIH HHS T32-GM 008616
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA limitation of mandibular distraction osteogenesis (DO) is the length of time required for consolidation. This drawback subjects patients to possible pin-site infections, as well as a prolonged return to activities of normal daily living. Developing innovative techniques to abridge consolidation periods could be immensely effective in preventing these problematic morbidities. Deferoxamine (DFO) is an angiogenic activator that triggers the HIF-1α pathway through localized iron depletion. We previously established the effectiveness of DFO in enhancing regenerate vascularity at a full consolidation period (28 days) in a murine mandibular DO model. To investigate whether this augmentation in vascularity would function to accelerate consolidation, we progressively shortened consolidation periods prior to μCT imaging and biomechanical testing (BMT). MATERIALS AND

methodsThree time points (14d, 21d and 28d) were selected and six groups of Sprague-Dawley rats (n = 60) were equally divided into control (C) and experimental (E) groups for each time period. Each group underwent external fixator placement, mandibular osteotomy, and a 5.1 mm distraction. During distraction, the experimental groups were treated with DFO injections into the regenerate gap. After consolidation, mandibles were imaged and tension tested to failure. ANOVA was conducted between groups, and p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

resultsAt 14 days of consolidation the experimental group demonstrated significant increases in bone volume fraction (BVF), bone mineral density (BMD) and ultimate load (UL) in comparison to non-treated controls. The benefit of treatment was further substantiated by a striking 100% increase in the number of bony unions at this early time-period (C:4/10 vs. E:8/10). Furthermore, metrics of BVF, BMD, Yield and UL at 14 days with treatment demonstrated comparable metrics to those of the fully consolidated 28d control group.

conclusionBased on these findings, we contend that augmentation of vascular density through localized DFO injection delivers an efficient means for accelerating bone regeneration without significantly impacting bone quality or strength.

Indexed as

Angiogenesis Inducing AgentsAnimalsBone RegenerationDeferoxamineMaleMandibleOsteogenesis, DistractionRatsRats, Sprague-DawleySiderophoresAngiogenesis Inducing AgentsDeferoxamineSiderophores

Identifiers

PMID23598047
PMCPMC4162399
OpenAlexW2017870377

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.