Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23597808›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of preventive medicine2013

U.S. alcohol affordability and real tax rates, 1950-2011.

William C Kerr, Deidre Patterson, Thomas K Greenfield, Alison Snow Jones, Kerry Anne McGeary, Joseph V Terza, Christopher J Ruhm

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of preventive medicine, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Shifting patterns of disparities in unintentional injury mortality rates in the United States, 1999-2016.Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Erosion of State Alcohol Excise Taxes in the United States.Journal of studies on alcohol and drugs · 2018
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Impact of Maryland's 2011 alcohol sales tax increase on alcoholic beverage sales.The American journal of drug and alcohol abuse · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

William C KerrAlcohol Research Group, Public Health Institute, Emeryville, CA 94608, USA. wkerr@arg.org
Deidre Patterson
Thomas K Greenfield
Alison Snow Jones
Kerry Anne McGeary
Joseph V Terza
Christopher J Ruhm

Funding

TREND &STRUCTURE OF ALCOHOL DEPENDENCE--GENERAL POPULATION 1990 SURVEY DATAP50AA005595 · NIAAA · WESTERN CONSORTIUM FOR PUBLIC HEALTH · PI KERR, WILLIAM C. · 1985 to 2025
$34.1M
Quality Substitution Among Heavy and AUD Drinkers and Alcohol Tax PolicyR01AA017890 · NIAAA · DREXEL UNIVERSITY · PI RICH, JOHN A · 2009 to 2011
$924k
NIAAA NIH HHS P50 AA005595NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA017890NIAAA NIH HHS R01AA017890-03
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe affordability of alcoholic beverages, determined by the relationship of prices to incomes, may be an important factor in relation to heavy drinking, but little is known about how affordability has changed over time. PURPOSE: To calculate real prices and affordability measures for alcoholic beverages in the U.S. over the period from 1950 to 2011.

methodsAffordability is calculated as the percentage of mean disposable income required to purchase 1 drink per day of the cheapest spirits, as well as popular brands of spirits, beer, and wine. Alternative income and price measures also are considered. Analyses were conducted in 2012.

resultsOne drink per day of the cheapest brand of spirits required 0.29% of U.S. mean per capita disposable income in 2011 as compared to 1.02% in 1980, 2.24% in 1970, 3.61% in 1960, and 4.46% in 1950. One drink per day of a popular beer required 0.96% of income in 2010 compared to 4.87% in 1950, whereas a low-priced wine in 2011 required 0.36% of income compared to 1.05% in 1978. Reduced real federal and state tax rates were an important source of the declines in real prices.

conclusionsAlcoholic beverages sold for off-premises consumption are more affordable today than at any time in the past 60 years; dramatic increases in affordability occurred particularly in the 1960s and 1970s. Declines in real prices are a major component of this change. Increases in alcoholic beverage tax rates and/or implementing minimum prices, together with indexing these to inflation could be used to mitigate further declines in real prices.

Indexed as

Alcohol DrinkingAlcoholic BeveragesBeerHumansIncomeTaxesUnited StatesWine

Identifiers

PMID23597808
PMCPMC3631317

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.