Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23597807›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of preventive medicine2013

Insurance coverage for weight loss: overweight adults' views.

Marian P Jarlenski, Kimberly A Gudzune, Wendy L Bennett, Lisa A Cooper, Sara N Bleich

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of preventive medicine, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Weight maintenance: challenges, tools and strategies for primary care physicians.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2016
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Marian P JarlenskiDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA. mjarlens@jhsph.edu
Kimberly A Gudzune
Wendy L Bennett
Lisa A Cooper
Sara N Bleich
Johns Hopkins University · USJohns Hopkins Medicine · US

Funding

TRAINING COREP50HL105187 · NHLBI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI GOLDEN, SHERITA HILL · 2010 to 2014
$9.8M
Patient-Oriented Research in Cardiovascular DisparitiesK24HL083113 · NHLBI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI COOPER, LISA A · 2006 to 2015
$2.0M
Racial Disparities in Physician Practice Patterns and Self-Management of ObesityK01HL096409 · NHLBI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI BLEICH, SARA NAOMI · 2009 to 2013
$699k
NHLBI NIH HHS 1K01HL096409NHLBI NIH HHS K01 HL096409NHLBI NIH HHS K24 HL083113NHLBI NIH HHS K24HL083113NHLBI NIH HHS P50 HL0105187NHLBI NIH HHS P50 HL105187PHS HHS T32HP10025-17-00
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGiven the prevalence of obesity and associated chronic conditions among U.S. adults, wellness benefits are an increasingly popular approach to promoting weight loss. PURPOSE: The goal of the study was to assess overweight and obese adults' beliefs about the helpfulness of insurance coverage of weight loss-related benefits, their willingness to pay for such benefits, and whether these opinions differ by individuals' weight or health insurance type.

methodsA national survey was fielded in 2012 among non-pregnant, overweight, and obese adults who had seen a primary care provider in the past year (n=600). Descriptive statistics summarized beliefs about which weight loss-related benefits would be helpful, willingness to pay for such benefits, and agreement about whether health insurers should be able to charge more to obese individuals. Multivariable logistic regression was employed to determine whether beliefs differed by weight category or health insurance type. Analyses were conducted in July 2012.

resultsThe majority (83%) of respondents cited a specific benefit as helpful. Those with private health insurance had a higher probability (89%, 95% CI=86%, 93%) of endorsing any benefit as helpful relative to those with other types of health insurance. Being obese relative to overweight was associated with greater support (57% vs 39%, p<0.05) for preventing health insurers from charging higher premiums to obese individuals.

conclusionsIn this sample of overweight adults, a large proportion endorsed the value of weight loss-related benefits offered by health plans. However, only about one third were willing to pay extra for them, and half disagreed with the notion that health plans should charge more to obese individuals. Given evidence of their effectiveness, wellness benefits should be offered to all individuals.

Indexed as

AttitudeAdultFemaleHealth PromotionHealth Services AccessibilityHumansInsurance CoverageLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedOverweightUnited StatesWeight Reduction Programs

Identifiers

PMID23597807
PMCPMC3671931
OpenAlexW101535027

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.