Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23597382›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of public health2013

The impact of cigarette excise tax increases on purchasing behaviors among New York city smokers.

Micaela H Coady, Christina A Chan, Rachel Sacks, Ijeoma G Mbamalu, Susan M Kansagra

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of public health, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Complexity and dynamism from an urban health perspective: a rationale for a system dynamics approach.Journal of urban health : bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine · 2015
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Micaela H CoadyBureau of Chronic Disease Prevention and Tobacco Control, New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, Queens, NY 11101, USA.
Christina A Chan
Rachel Sacks
Ijeoma G Mbamalu
Susan M Kansagra

Funding

CATEGORY B: COMMUNITIES PUTTING PREVENTION TO WORKU58DP002419 · DP · FUND FOR PUBLIC HEALTH IN NEW YORK, INC. · PI KILGORE, ELIAZABETH · 2010 to 2010
$18.3M
NCCDPHP CDC HHS 3U58DP002419-01S1NCCDPHP CDC HHS U58 DP002419
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesWe examined the relationship between cigarette excise tax increases and tax-avoidant purchasing behaviors among New York City adult smokers.

methodsWe analyzed data from the city's annual Community Health Survey to assess changes in rates of tax avoidance over time (2003-2010) and smokers' responses to the 2008 state cigarette tax increase. Multivariable logistic regression analysis identified correlates of buying more cigarettes on the street in response to the increase.

resultsAfter the 2002 tax increase, the percentage of smokers engaged in tax-avoidant behavior decreased with time from 30% in 2003 to 13% in 2007. Following the 2008 tax increase, 21% of smokers reported buying more cigarettes from another person on the street. Low-income, younger, Black, and Hispanic smokers were more likely than respondents with other sociodemographic characteristics to purchase more cigarettes on the street.

conclusionsTo maximize public health impact, cigarette tax increases should be paired with efforts to limit the flow of untaxed cigarettes entering jurisdictions with high cigarette pack prices.

Indexed as

AdultBehaviorCommerceHealth SurveysHumansLogistic ModelsNew York CityPrevalenceSmokingTaxesTobacco Products

Identifiers

PMID23597382
PMCPMC3698745

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.