ArticleCritical care (London, England)2013
Decreasing severe pain and serious adverse events while moving intensive care unit patients: a prospective interventional study (the NURSE-DO project).
Article in Critical care (London, England), 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
35 citing papers in PubMed, 118 citations in OpenAlex.
- Hypnosis for unplanned procedural pain in the intensive care unit: the HYPIC randomized clinical trial.Critical care (London, England) · 2025Trial
- Discomfort improvement for critically ill patients using electronic relaxation devices: results of the cross-over randomized controlled trial E-CHOISIR (Electronic-CHOIce of a System for Intensive care Relaxation).Critical care (London, England) · 2022Trial
- Automated vs. conventional ventilation in the ICU: a randomized controlled crossover trial comparing blood oxygen saturation during daily nursing procedures (I-NURSING).Critical care (London, England) · 2020Trial
- Fentanyl as pre-emptive treatment of pain associated with turning mechanically ventilated patients: a randomized controlled feasibility study.Intensive care medicine · 2016Trial
- Acute Pain During Intensive Care: Prevalence, Predisposing Factors and Pain Trajectories. A Prospective Multicenter Observational Study.Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica · 2026Observational
- Stress ball use as a non-pharmacological intervention in critically Ill patients: A randomized controlled trial.Irish journal of medical science · 2026Article
- Saudi Guideline for Mechanical Ventilation in Adults.Saudi journal of medicine & medical sciences · 2026Article
- Nociception and pain assessment during suctioning procedures in mechanically ventilated patients in the intensive care unit: A validation study of the Nociception Level index (NOL™).Canadian journal of pain = Revue canadienne de la douleur · 2026Article
- Delirium Related to Sedation: Prevention Strategies and Patient Perspectives.Intensive care medicine · 2025Article
- Effects of cipepofol on breathing patterns, respiratory drive, and inspiratory effort in mechanically ventilated patients.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Challenges of the Regional Anesthetic Techniques in Intensive Care Units - A Narrative Review.Journal of critical care medicine (Universitatea de Medicina si Farmacie din Targu-Mures) · 2024Review
- Current Practice and Barriers to the Implementation of Mobilization in ICUs in Japan: A Multicenter Prospective Cohort Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Pain Behavior Experienced During Nursing Interventions by Patients on Mechanical Ventilation: A Cross-Sectional Study.Florence Nightingale journal of nursing · 2022Article
- Pain in Intensive Care: A Narrative Review.Pain and therapy · 2022Review
- Management of procedural pain in the intensive care unit.World journal of clinical cases · 2022Review
- Pain Control and Opioid Use in ICU should be a Quality Parameter.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2021Article
- Pain Action Unit Detection in Critically Ill Patients.Proceedings : Annual International Computer Software and Applications Conference. COMPSAC · 2021Article
- Semi-automated tracking of pain in critical care patients using artificial intelligence: a retrospective observational study.Scientific reports · 2021Observational
- Consensus Statement on Analgo-sedation in Neurocritical Care and Review of Literature.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2021Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
10 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionA quality-improvement project was conducted to reduce severe pain and stress-related events while moving ICU-patients.
methodsThe Plan-Do-Check-Adjust cycle was studied during four one-month phases, separated by five-month interphases. All consecutive patients staying more than 24 hours were evaluated every morning while being moved for nursing care (bathing, massage, sheet-change, repositioning). Phase 1 was considered as the baseline. Implemented and adjusted quality-interventions were assessed at phases 2 and 3, respectively. An independent post-intervention control-audit was performed at Phase 4. Primary-endpoints were the incidence of severe pain defined by a behavioral pain scale > 5 or a 0 to 10 visual numeric rating scale > 6, and the incidence of serious adverse events (SAE): cardiac arrest, arrhythmias, tachycardia, bradycardia, hypertension, hypotension, desaturation, bradypnea or ventilatory distress. Pain, SAE, patients' characteristics and analgesia were compared among the phases by a multivariate mixed-effects model for repeated-measurements, adjusted on severity index, age, admission type (medical/surgical), intubation and sedation status.
resultsDuring the four studied phases, 630 care procedures were analyzed in 53, 47, 43 and 50 patients, respectively. Incidence of severe pain decreased significantly from 16% (baseline) to 6% in Phase 3 (odds ratio (OR) = 0.33 (0.11; 0.98), P = 0.04) and 2% in Phase 4 (OR = 0.30 (0.12; 0.95), P = 0.02). Incidence of SAE decreased significantly from 37% (baseline) to 17% in Phase 3 and 21% in Phase 4. In multivariate analysis, SAE were independently associated with Phase 3 (OR = 0.40 (0.23; 0.72), P < 0.01), Phase 4 (OR = 0.53 (0.30; 0.92), P = 0.03), intubation status (OR = 1.91 (1.28; 2.85), P < 0.01) and severe pain (OR = 2.74 (1.54; 4.89), P < 0.001).
conclusionsSevere pain and serious adverse events are common and strongly associated while moving ICU patients for nursing procedures. Quality improvement of pain management is associated with a decrease of serious adverse events. Careful documentation of pain management during mobilization for nursing procedures could be implemented as a health quality indicator in the ICU.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.