Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23596501›Full record

ArticleDeutsches Arzteblatt international2013

Adverse drug events in older patients admitted as an emergency: the role of potentially inappropriate medication in elderly people (PRISCUS).

Harald Dormann, Anja Sonst, Fabian Müller, Renate Vogler, Andrius Patapovas, Barbara Pfistermeister, Bettina Plank-Kiegele, Melanie Kirchner, Nina Hartmann, Thomas Bürkle and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Deutsches Arzteblatt international, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 84 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Potentially inappropriate medication in older psychiatric patients.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Harald DormannDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Hospital Fürth, Germany.
Anja Sonst
Fabian Müller
Renate Vogler
Andrius Patapovas
Barbara Pfistermeister
Bettina Plank-Kiegele
Melanie Kirchner
Nina Hartmann
Thomas Bürkle
Renke Maas
Universitätsklinikum Erlangen · DECenter for Clinical Studies · USFriedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLists of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) for the elderly, such as the German PRISCUS list, have been published as expert recommendations with the aim of improving drug safety for this patient group. In this study, we tried to determine how often adverse drug events occur in the emergency department and what role PRISCUS medications might play in these events.

methodsWe prospectively reviewed the medical records of 752 patients who were treated in the emergency department (ED) of a level III hospital in Germany for adverse drug events due to medication errors (MEs) and for adverse drug reactions (ADRs). The evaluation was performed in two steps by pharmacologists, clinical pharmacologists, and board-certified internists.

resultsBoth clinically important MEs and ADRs became more common with advancing age. Among the 351 patients who were over age 65, 307 (87.5%) were taking at least one medication at home. Of these 307 patients, 16.6% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 12.9-21.2%) were taking at least one PIM, as defined by the German PRISCUS list. In relative terms, PIMs were more commonly associated with ADRs or MEs than other drugs (27.0% [95% CI: 17.5-39.1% versus 15.7% [95% CI: 14.1-17.4%], Odds ratio 1.99 [95% CI: 1.23-3.52: p = 0.018), but in absolute terms ADRs and MEs involved non-PIM more often than PIM.

conclusionElderly patients more frequently suffer from ADR and from the clinical consequences of medication errors. Elderly patients taking PIMs are more likely to suffer from ADRs and MEs, even though most drug-related events are still attributable to non-PIM.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsEmergency Medical ServicesEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleGermanyHumansInappropriate PrescribingMaleMedication ErrorsPatient AdmissionPrevalenceRisk Assessment

Identifiers

PMID23596501
PMCPMC3627162
OpenAlexW2129616553

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.