ArticleThe Permanente journal2013
Breast cancer screening in an insured population: whom are we missing?
Article in The Permanente journal, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- Social determinants of health and health inequities in breast cancer screening: a scoping review.Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
- Long-term Mammography Adherence among Uninsured Women Enrolled in the Breast Screening and Patient Navigation (BSPAN) Program.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2022Article
- Relationship of attitudes toward uncertainty and preventive health behaviors with breast cancer screening participation.BMC women's health · 2021Article
- Lung cancer screening patient-provider discussion: Where do we stand and what are the associated factors?SAGE open medicine · 2019Article
- Travel Burden to Breast MRI and Utilization: Are Risk and Sociodemographics Related?Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR · 2016Article
- Is the closest facility the one actually used? An assessment of travel time estimation based on mammography facilities.International journal of health geographics · 2016Article
- The relationship between four health-related quality-of-life indicators and use of mammography and Pap test screening in US women.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2015Article
- Article
- Factors influencing breast cancer screening in low-income African Americans in Tennessee.Journal of community health · 2014Article
- Association between individual and geographic factors and nonadherence to mammography screening guidelines.Journal of women's health (2002) · 2014Article
- Continuum of mammography use among US women: classification tree analysis.American journal of health behavior · 2014Article
- Ethnic differences and predictors of colonoscopy, prostate-specific antigen, and mammography screening participation in the multiethnic cohort.Cancer epidemiology · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
introductionKaiser Permanente Colorado is an integrated health care system that uses automatic reminder programs and reduces barriers to access preventive services, including financial barriers. Breast cancer screening rates have not improved during the last five years, and rates differ between subgroups: for example, black and Latina women have lower rates of mammography screening than other racial groups.
methodsWe retrospectively evaluated data from 47,946 women age 52 to 69 years who had continuous membership for 24 months but had not undergone mammography. Poisson regression models estimated relative risk for the impact of self-identified race/ethnicity, socioeconomic characteristics, health status, and use of health care services on screening completion.
resultsThe distribution of race/ethnicity among unscreened women was 55.5% white, 7.0% Latina, and 3.7% black, but race/ethnicity data were missing for 29%. Of these, no record of race/ethnicity was available for 86.7%, and for 5.1%, the data request was recorded but the women declined to identify their race/ethnicity. Nonwhite ethnicity increased risk of screening failure if black, Latina, "other" (eg, American Indian), or missing race/ethnicity. Population-attributable risks were low for minorities compared with the group for whom race/ethnicity data was missing. A greater number of office visits in any setting was associated with greater likelihood of undergoing mammography. Women with missing race/ethnicity data had fewer visits and were less likely to have an identified primary care physician.
conclusionsGreater improvement in mammography screening rates could be achieved in our population by increasing screening among women with missing race/ethnicity data, rather than by targeting those who are known to be of racial/ethnic minorities. Efforts to address screening disparities have been refocused on inreach and outreach to our "missing women."
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.