Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23596335›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2013

Inhibition to retinal rod bipolar cells is regulated by light levels.

Erika D Eggers, Reece E Mazade, Justin S Klein

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Contributions of Rod and Cone Pathways to Retinal Direction Selectivity Through Development.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2016
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Low concentrations of ethanol but not of dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) impair reciprocal retinal signal transduction.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2015
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Erika D EggersDepartment of Physiology, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85724, USA. eeggers@u.arizona.edu
Reece E Mazade
Justin S Klein

Funding

GRADUATE TRAINING IN SYSTEMS AND INTERGRATIVE PHYSIOLOGYT32GM008400 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI HOYER, PATRICIA B · 1991 to 2011
$2.3M
GABAergic and Glycinergic Inhibition in the Inner RetinaR00EY018131 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI EGGERS, ERIKA D. · 2009 to 2011
$728k
NEI NIH HHS EY-018131NEI NIH HHS R00 EY018131NIGMS NIH HHS GM-8400
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The retina responds to a wide range of light stimuli by adaptation of retinal signaling to background light intensity and the use of two different photoreceptors: rods that sense dim light and cones that sense bright light. Rods signal to rod bipolar cells that receive significant inhibition from amacrine cells in the dark, especially from a rod bipolar cell-activated GABAergic amacrine cell. This inhibition modulates the output of rod bipolar cells onto downstream neurons. However, it was not clear how the inhibition of rod bipolar cells changes when rod signaling is limited by an adapting background light and cone signaling becomes dominant. We found that both light-evoked and spontaneous rod bipolar cell inhibition significantly decrease with light adaptation. This suggests a global decrease in the activity of amacrine cells that provide input to rod bipolar cells with light adaptation. However, inhibition to rod bipolar cells is also limited by GABAergic connections between amacrine cells, which decrease GABAergic input to rod bipolar cells. When we removed this serial inhibition, the light-evoked inhibition to rod bipolar cells remained after light adaptation. These results suggest that decreased inhibition to rod bipolar cells after light adaptation is due to decreased rod pathway activity as well as an active increase in inhibition between amacrine cells. Together these serve to limit rod bipolar cell inhibition after light adaptation, when the rod pathway is inactive and modulation of the signal is not required. This suggests an efficiency mechanism in the retina to limit unnecessary signaling.

Indexed as

Adaptation, OcularAmacrine CellsAnimalsMiceMice, Inbred C57BLNeural InhibitionRetinal Bipolar CellsRetinal Cone Photoreceptor CellsRetinal Rod Photoreceptor CellsGABAglycinelightpatch clampretina

Identifiers

PMID23596335
PMCPMC3727031

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.