Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23596247›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2013

Results of external quality assessment for proviral DNA testing of HIV tropism in the Maraviroc Switch collaborative study.

Elise Tu, Luke C Swenson, Sally Land, Sarah Pett, Sean Emery, Kat Marks, Anthony D Kelleher, Steve Kaye, Rolf Kaiser, Eugene Schuelter and 2 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01384682 (Randomised, Openlabel Study Evaluating Efficacy and Safety of Maraviroc as a Switch for Either NRTI or PI/r in HIV-1 Infected Individuals With Stable, Well-Controlled Plasma HIV-RNA While Taking Their First N), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01384682 phase4completednot on this map

Randomised, Openlabel Study Evaluating Efficacy and Safety of Maraviroc as a Switch for Either NRTI or PI/r in HIV-1 Infected Individuals With Stable, Well-Controlled Plasma HIV-RNA While Taking Their First N(t)RTI + PI/r Regimen of cART

TypeinterventionalSponsorKirby InstituteRan2011 to 2015Enrolled399ConditionsHIVArmsMaraviroc
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 5 countries.

Elise TuThe Kirby Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia. etu@kirby.unsw.edu.au
Luke C Swenson
Sally Land
Sarah Pett
Sean Emery
Kat Marks
Anthony D Kelleher
Steve Kaye
Rolf Kaiser
Eugene Schuelter
Richard Harrigan
MARCH Laboratory Group and the MARCH Study Group
UNSW Sydney · AUSt. Vincent's Birmingham · USUniversity of British Columbia · CAUniversity of Cologne · DEImperial College London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Maraviroc Switch collaborative study (MARCH) is a study in aviremic patients on stable antiretroviral therapy and utilizes population-based sequencing of proviral DNA to determine HIV tropism and susceptibility to maraviroc. An external quality assessment (EQA) program was implemented to ensure competency in assessing the tropism of clinical samples conducted by MARCH laboratories (n = 14). The MARCH EQA has three prestudy phases assessing V3 loop sequencing and tropism determination using the bioinformatic algorithm geno2pheno, which generates a false-positive rate (FPR). DNA sequences with low FPRs are more likely to be from CXCR4-using (X4) viruses. Phase 1 of the EQA involved chromatogram interpretation. Phases 2, 2/3, and 3 involved patient and clonal samples. Clinical samples used in these phases were from treatment-experienced HIV-infected volunteers; 18/20 had viral loads of <50 copies/ml, and 10/15 were CXCR4-tropic on prior phenotyping. All samples were tested in triplicate, and any replicate with a geno2pheno FPR of <10% was designated X4. Performance was deemed adequate if ≤2 R5 and ≤1 X4 specimens were miscalled. For several clinical samples in the EQA, triplicate testing revealed marked DNA variability (FPR range, 0 to 96.7%). Therefore, a consensus-based approach was employed for each sample, i.e., a median FPR across laboratories was used to define sample tropism. Further sequencing analysis showed mixed viral populations in the clinical samples, explaining the differences in tropism predictions. All laboratories passed the EQA after achieving predefined competence thresholds in either of the phase 2 rounds. The use of clinical samples from patients resembling those who were likely to be screened in the MARCH, coupled with triplicate testing, revealed inherent DNA variability that might have been missed if single or duplicate testing and/or clonal samples alone were used. These data highlight the importance of intensive EQA of tropism laboratories before embarking on clinical studies. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under registration no. NCT01384682 [http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/study/NCT01384682?term=NCT01384682&rank=1].).

Indexed as

Laboratory Proficiency TestingViral TropismAnti-HIV AgentsClinical Laboratory TechniquesCyclohexanesDNA, ViralHIV-1HIV InfectionsHumansMaravirocProvirusesTriazolesAnti-HIV AgentsCyclohexanesDNA, ViralMaravirocTriazoles

Identifiers

PMID23596247
PMCPMC3697703
OpenAlexW2145116602

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.